From: Dan Aloni <da-x@monatomic.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] tty_io.c: don't use flush_scheduled_work()
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:53:50 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070816115349.GA26908@localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070701153749.GA111@tv-sign.ru>
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 07:37:49PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> I don't know how to test this patch, the ack/nack from maintainer is wanted.
>
> flush_scheduled_work() is evil and should be avoided. Change tty_set_ldisc()
> and release_dev() to use cancel_delayed_work_sync/cancel_work_sync.
>
> I am not sure we really need to call do_tty_hangup() when cancel_work_sync()
> returns true, but this matches the current behaviour.
I also noticed this problem recently with 2.6.22, on a 2-CPU box where there
was one SCHED_RR userspace process stuck in a busy loop. The box was completely
responsive but had this annoyance where all tty closings were stuck in
flush_scheduled_work(). It's especially noticable when you ssh to the machine
and then try to log out.
A temporary workaround was to give just the workqueue events/* threads a
SCHED_FIFO static priority of 99, but I have kept that small patch to
myself (figured it's just too nasty).
--
Dan Aloni
XIV LTD, http://www.xivstorage.com
da-x (at) monatomic.org, dan (at) xiv.co.il
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-16 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-01 15:37 [PATCH 3/3] tty_io.c: don't use flush_scheduled_work() Oleg Nesterov
2007-07-01 16:22 ` Alan Cox
2007-07-01 16:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-08-16 11:53 ` Dan Aloni [this message]
2007-08-16 16:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-08-21 6:09 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070816115349.GA26908@localdomain \
--to=da-x@monatomic.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox