public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Aloni <da-x@monatomic.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] tty_io.c: don't use flush_scheduled_work()
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:53:50 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070816115349.GA26908@localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070701153749.GA111@tv-sign.ru>

On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 07:37:49PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> I don't know how to test this patch, the ack/nack from maintainer is wanted.
> 
> flush_scheduled_work() is evil and should be avoided. Change tty_set_ldisc()
> and release_dev() to use cancel_delayed_work_sync/cancel_work_sync.
> 
> I am not sure we really need to call do_tty_hangup() when cancel_work_sync()
> returns true, but this matches the current behaviour.

I also noticed this problem recently with 2.6.22, on a 2-CPU box where there 
was one SCHED_RR userspace process stuck in a busy loop. The box was completely 
responsive but had this annoyance where all tty closings were stuck in 
flush_scheduled_work(). It's especially noticable when you ssh to the machine
and then try to log out.

A temporary workaround was to give just the workqueue events/* threads a 
SCHED_FIFO static priority of 99, but I have kept that small patch to 
myself (figured it's just too nasty).

-- 
Dan Aloni
XIV LTD, http://www.xivstorage.com
da-x (at) monatomic.org, dan (at) xiv.co.il

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-08-16 11:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-01 15:37 [PATCH 3/3] tty_io.c: don't use flush_scheduled_work() Oleg Nesterov
2007-07-01 16:22 ` Alan Cox
2007-07-01 16:47   ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-08-16 11:53 ` Dan Aloni [this message]
2007-08-16 16:03   ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-08-21  6:09   ` Jarek Poplawski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070816115349.GA26908@localdomain \
    --to=da-x@monatomic.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jarkao2@o2.pl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox