From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
John Berthels <jjberthels@gmail.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] maps: /proc/<pid>/pmaps interface - memory maps in granularity of pages
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:58:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070817165808.GM30556@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070817064727.GA6723@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 02:47:27PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Matt,
>
> It's not easy to do direct performance comparisons between pmaps and
> pagemap/kpagemap. However some close analyzes are still possible :)
>
> 1) code size
> pmaps ~200 LOC
> pagemap/kpagemap ~300 LOC
>
> 2) dataset size
> take for example my running firefox on Intel Core 2:
> VSZ 400 MB
> RSS 64 MB, or 16k pages
> pmaps 64 KB, wc shows 2k lines, or so much page ranges
> pagemap 800 KB, could be heavily optimized by returning partial data
I take it you're in 64-bit mode?
You're right, this data compresses well in many circumstances. I
suspect it will suffer under memory pressure though. That will
fragment the ranges in-memory and also fragment the active bits. The
worst case here is huge, of course, but realistically I'd expect
something like 2x-4x.
But there are still the downsides I have mentioned:
- you don't get page frame numbers
- you can't do random access
And how long does it take to pull the data out? My benchmarks show
greater than 50MB/s (and that's with the version in -mm that's doing
double buffering), so that 800K would take < .016s.
> kpagemap 256 KB
>
> 3) runtime overheads
> pmaps 2k lines of string processing(encode/decode)
> kpagemap 16k seek()/read()s, and context switches (could be
> optimized somehow by doing a PFN sort first, but
> that's also non-trivial overheads)
You can do anywhere between 16k small reads or 1 large read. Depends
what data you're trying to get. Right now, kpagemap is fast enough
that I can do realtime displays of the whole of memory in my desktop
in a GUI written in Python. And Python is fairly horrible for drawing
bitmaps and such.
http://www.selenic.com/Screenshot-kpagemap.png
> So pmaps seems to be a clear winner :)
Except that it's only providing a subset of the data.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-17 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070816220516.782145952@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-08-16 22:05 ` [PATCH 0/4] process memory footprints in proc/<pid>/[s|p]maps Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <20070816220849.064901548@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-08-16 22:05 ` [PATCH 1/4] maps: PSS(proportional set size) accounting in smaps Fengguang Wu
2007-08-17 2:13 ` Matt Mackall
[not found] ` <20070817024443.GA5521@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-08-17 2:44 ` Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <20070816220849.313377588@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-08-16 22:05 ` [PATCH 3/4] maps: introduce generic_maps_open() Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <20070816220849.472883642@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-08-16 22:05 ` [PATCH 4/4] maps: /proc/<pid>/pmaps interface - memory maps in granularity of pages Fengguang Wu
2007-08-17 2:38 ` Matt Mackall
[not found] ` <20070817034437.GC5521@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-08-17 3:44 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-08-17 3:56 ` Matt Mackall
[not found] ` <20070817064727.GA6723@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-08-17 6:47 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-08-17 16:58 ` Matt Mackall [this message]
[not found] ` <20070818024831.GA7856@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-08-18 2:48 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-08-18 6:40 ` Matt Mackall
[not found] ` <20070818103146.GA6744@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-08-18 10:31 ` Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <20070818084531.GB5277@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-08-18 8:45 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-08-18 17:22 ` Matt Mackall
[not found] ` <20070819004008.GA5297@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-08-19 0:40 ` Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <20070816220849.192029043@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-08-16 22:05 ` [PATCH 2/4] maps: address based vma walking Fengguang Wu
2007-08-17 2:16 ` Matt Mackall
[not found] ` <20070817025454.GB5521@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-08-17 2:54 ` Fengguang Wu
[not found] <20070819075410.411207640@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
[not found] ` <20070819075547.785390741@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-08-19 7:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] maps: /proc/<pid>/pmaps interface - memory maps in granularity of pages Fengguang Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070817165808.GM30556@waste.org \
--to=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=jjberthels@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox