From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: bunk@kernel.org, josh@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make rcutorture RNG use temporal entropy
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:00:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070817200022.GH8464@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070817115356.cb201e42.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 11:53:56AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:49:04 -0700
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Repost of http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/10/472 made available by request.
> >
> > The locking used by get_random_bytes() can conflict with the
> > preempt_disable() and synchronize_sched() form of RCU. This patch changes
> > rcutorture's RNG to gather entropy from the new cpu_clock() interface
> > (relying on interrupts, preemption, daemons, and rcutorture's reader
> > thread's rock-bottom scheduling priority to provide useful entropy),
> > and also adds and EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() to make that interface available
> > to GPLed kernel modules such as rcutorture.
> >
> > Passes several hours of rcutorture.
>
> Please explain what "conflict with" means so that I can work out if
> this is a needed-in-2.6.23 change, thanks.
Not needed in 2.6.23. This change falls into the "preparation for -rt"
category. Also in the "don't unnecessarily eat entropy, leave some for
the people needing crypographically secure randomness" category.
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-17 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-16 2:49 [PATCH] Make rcutorture RNG use temporal entropy Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-17 18:53 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-17 20:00 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2007-08-23 18:06 ` Matt Mackall
2007-08-23 18:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-23 19:40 ` Matt Mackall
2007-08-28 1:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-03 13:29 ` Matt Mackall
2007-09-03 20:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-04 5:46 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-09-04 16:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-04 17:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070817200022.GH8464@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=josh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox