From: "Andreas Jellinghaus [c]" <aj@ciphirelabs.com>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] why was MODALIAS removed from usb kernel events? [u]
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:41:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200708211441.15645.aj@ciphirelabs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1187696468.2489.10.camel@lov.localdomain>
thanks, the patch works great!
would be nice if it could be send to the stable team as well
(I think a number of distributions want to use 2.6.22 as base
for there next release, and I would be happy if users had the patch
in it).
sorry for creating confusion: initially I thought MODALIAS had been removed,
as I looked at the event with DEVICE and in 2.6.21 it has MODALIAS= and in
2.6.22 it doesn't. that was wrong, I should have looked at the MODALIAS event
to find out that DEVICE, TYPE and PRODUCT where missing. sorry again.
> Andreas, do I read this right, you miss:
> DEVICE, PRODUCT, TYPE
> in the usb-interface event, and they only exist in the usb-device event?
yes, in 2.6.21 two events have DEVICE (one of them has also MODALIAS), in
2.6.22 one event has DEVICE and PRODUCT and TYPE, the other one MODALIAS,
no event has both. your patch fixes this, thanks!
> +#ifdef CONFIG_USB_DEVICEFS
does this depend on USB_CLASS_DEVICE? i.e. will it break if USB_CLASS_DEVICE
is turned off? a migration plan / what shall I do so my code still works
when that is done, would be very nice. and enough time so I can get new
versions out to the users. so far the kernel was faster and I got bug reports
about openct not working with 2.6.22 :(
Regards, Andreas
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-21 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-17 14:22 why was MODALIAS removed from usb kernel events? [u] Andreas Jellinghaus [c]
2007-08-17 14:50 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Alan Stern
2007-08-17 15:05 ` Andreas Jellinghaus [c]
2007-08-17 17:12 ` Alan Stern
2007-08-18 19:32 ` Andreas Jellinghaus [c]
2007-08-20 15:59 ` Alan Stern
2007-08-21 6:45 ` Andreas Jellinghaus [c]
2007-08-21 7:36 ` Greg KH
2007-08-21 8:39 ` Andreas Jellinghaus [c]
2007-08-21 11:41 ` Kay Sievers
2007-08-21 12:21 ` Andreas Jellinghaus [c]
2007-08-21 15:22 ` Kay Sievers
2007-08-21 12:41 ` Andreas Jellinghaus [c] [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200708211441.15645.aj@ciphirelabs.com \
--to=aj@ciphirelabs.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox