From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760234AbXHVTDP (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:03:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755852AbXHVTC4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:02:56 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60984 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762691AbXHVTCz (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:02:55 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 21:56:45 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: travis@sgi.com Cc: Andi Kleen , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] x86: fix cpu_to_node references Message-ID: <20070822195645.GF8058@bingen.suse.de> References: <20070822172101.138513000@sgi.com> <20070822172124.071200000@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070822172124.071200000@sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:21:06AM -0700, travis@sgi.com wrote: > Fix four instances where cpu_to_node is referenced > by array instead of via the cpu_to_node macro. This > is preparation to moving it to the per_cpu data area. Shouldn't this patch be logically before the per cpu conversion (which is 3/6). This way the result would be git bisectable. -Andi