Re: [2.6.20.17 review 00/58] 2.6.20.17 -stable review

James Morris
2007-08-22T14:08:37Z

On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Stephen Smalley wrote:

> Oops, never mind - tail still follows secmark, so that shouldn't matter.
> So I'm not sure why we are getting a bad value for secmark here - should
> be initialized to zero and never modified unless there is an iptables
> secmark rule.

Michal, do you see this in current git?

--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>