Re: [2.6.20.17 review 00/58] 2.6.20.17 -stable review

Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-22T14:29:50Z

On 22/08/07, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Stephen Smalley wrote:
>
> > Oops, never mind - tail still follows secmark, so that shouldn't matter.
> > So I'm not sure why we are getting a bad value for secmark here - should
> > be initialized to zero and never modified unless there is an iptables
> > secmark rule.
>
> Michal, do you see this in current git?

No, I do not see this problem in 2.6.23. I had similar problem last
month, but it is fixed now.

http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/12/362

Regards,
Michal

--
LOG