From: "Scott Thompson" <postfail@hushmail.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Ideas on column length in kernel "problem"?
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 23:54:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070823035442.6FD0DDA81F@mailserver7.hushmail.com> (raw)
I haven't seen any recent solutions to this "problem"...
Many free (and not-free) mail clients wordwrap. Hushmail wraps at
68 (verified), Yahoo has options to wrap at a max of 99, and Gmail
was somewhere around 85-90 as I recall. Not sure on other free /
inexpensive clients.
However, several code modules have code lines with column lengths
well over 80 (the worst I have seen was 211). This prevents people
with "minimal function" email clients (I'm being generous) from
making changes in the area of these long code lines, or from even
submitting fixes for the line length problem in modules themselves.
I don't have an easy solution short of finding volunteer(s) who can
submit patches to resolve this or peer-pressuring module owners
into resolving, so opening this issue up to the list for ideas
here. In the meantime I'll run a quick review to assess just how
many changes this would be ...
Note -- I am well aware that us 'poor users' could just 'get a real
email service', and if anyone knows of a free/inexpensive mail
client that will be able to handle the wordwrap requirements for
the current state of the linux tree please advise.
---------------------------------------
Scott Thompson / postfail@hushmail.com
---------------------------------------
next reply other threads:[~2007-08-23 3:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-23 3:54 Scott Thompson [this message]
2007-08-23 4:05 ` Ideas on column length in kernel "problem"? Adrian Bunk
2007-08-24 8:17 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2007-08-23 7:36 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-08-23 11:56 ` walter harms
2007-08-23 12:00 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-08-23 12:27 ` Jesper Juhl
2007-08-24 1:43 ` Bron Gondwana
2007-08-24 10:31 ` Andi Drebes
2007-08-24 10:46 ` Alan Cox
2007-08-24 11:07 ` Jesper Juhl
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-24 16:31 Scott Thompson
2007-08-24 16:51 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-08-24 19:09 Scott Thompson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070823035442.6FD0DDA81F@mailserver7.hushmail.com \
--to=postfail@hushmail.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox