From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@elte.hu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
josht@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tytso@us.ibm.com, dvhltc@us.ibm.com,
tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Priority boosting for preemptible RCU
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:56:39 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070823042639.GA28026@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070822190254.GA1135@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hi Paul,
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 12:02:54PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> +/*
> + * Print out RCU booster task statistics at the specified interval.
> + */
> +static void rcu_boost_dat_stat_print(void)
> +{
> + /* Three decimal digits per byte plus spacing per number and line. */
> + char buf[N_RCU_BOOST_STATE * (sizeof(long) * 3 + 2) + 2];
> + int cpu;
> + int event;
> + int i;
> + static time_t lastprint = 0;
> + struct rcu_boost_dat *rbdp;
> + int state;
> + struct rcu_boost_dat sum;
> +
> + /* Wait a graceful interval between printk spamming. */
> +
> + if (xtime.tv_sec - lastprint <
> + CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU_BOOST_STATS_INTERVAL)
> + return;
> +
> + /* Sum up the state/event-independent counters. */
> +
> + sum.rbs_blocked = 0;
> + sum.rbs_boost_attempt = 0;
> + sum.rbs_boost = 0;
> + sum.rbs_unlock = 0;
> + sum.rbs_unboosted = 0;
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> + for (i = 0; i < RCU_BOOST_ELEMENTS; i++) {
> + rbdp = per_cpu(rcu_boost_dat, cpu);
> + sum.rbs_blocked += rbdp[i].rbs_blocked;
> + sum.rbs_boost_attempt += rbdp[i].rbs_boost_attempt;
> + sum.rbs_boost += rbdp[i].rbs_boost;
> + sum.rbs_unlock += rbdp[i].rbs_unlock;
> + sum.rbs_unboosted += rbdp[i].rbs_unboosted;
> + }
I feel we should still be able to use for_each_online_cpu(cpu) instead
of for_each_possible_cpu. Again, there's a good chance that I might
be mistaken!
How about the following ?
preempt_disable(); /* We Dont want cpus going down here */
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
for (i = 0; i < RCU_BOOST_ELEMENTS; i++) {
rbdp = per_cpu(rcu_boost_dat, cpu);
sum.rbs_blocked += rbdp[i].rbs_blocked;
sum.rbs_boost_attempt += rbdp[i].rbs_boost_attempt;
sum.rbs_boost += rbdp[i].rbs_boost;
sum.rbs_unlock += rbdp[i].rbs_unlock;
sum.rbs_unboosted += rbdp[i].rbs_unboosted;
}
preempt_enable();
static int rcu_boost_cpu_callback(struct notifier_bloack *nb,
unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
{
int this_cpu, cpu;
rcu_boost_data *rbdp, *this_rbdp;
switch (action) {
case CPU_DEAD:
this_cpu = get_cpu();
cpu = (long)hcpu;
this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
rbdp = per_cpu(rcu_boost_dat, cpu);
this_rbdp = per_cpu(rcu_boost_dat, cpu);
/*
* Transfer all of rbdp's statistics to
* this_rbdp here.
*/
put_cpu();
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
}
Won't this work in this case?
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
--
Gautham R Shenoy
Linux Technology Center
IBM India.
"Freedom comes with a price tag of responsibility, which is still a bargain,
because Freedom is priceless!"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-23 4:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-22 19:02 [PATCH RFC] Priority boosting for preemptible RCU Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-22 19:43 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-22 20:23 ` Josh Triplett
2007-08-22 21:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-22 21:41 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-22 22:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-24 10:09 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-08-23 4:26 ` Gautham R Shenoy [this message]
2007-08-23 8:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-23 10:14 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-08-23 13:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-23 14:22 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-08-23 15:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-24 8:21 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-08-24 17:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070823042639.GA28026@in.ibm.com \
--to=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=josht@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tytso@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox