From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Satyam Sharma <satyam@infradead.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make kobject dynamic allocation check use kallsyms_lookup()
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 01:21:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070823082114.GA7945@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0708231037040.2049@enigma.security.iitk.ac.in>
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:48:23AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
>
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Dave Hansen wrote:
> >
> > One of the top ten sysfs problems is that users use statically
> > allocated kobjects. This patch reminds them that this is a
> > naughty thing.
>
> Hmm, I might've missed previous discussion regarding this, but I'm
> curious to know why using statically allocated kobjects is "naughty".
> The code / warnings / printk messages below indicate this is only a
> "silly/janitorial" issue?
>
> The reason I ask is that if it is serious, there is no reason why this
> check cannot be done at build-time itself, instead of this runtime
> kludge in the kernel -- catching potential bugs at build-time is always
> desirable. Modpost or some such tool can be taught to detect kobjects
> allocated statically in vmlinux/modules -- or there can be other build-
> time solutions, possibly. Have you considered such an approach?
If you have a patch to do so, I would appreciate it.
But the main reason I don't push such a change into Linus's tree is that
there are still a lot of statically allocated kobjects today, like all
driver definitions :(
Converting them to be dynamic is on my list of things to do, it's just a
ways down there.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-23 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-22 22:03 [PATCH] make kobject dynamic allocation check use kallsyms_lookup() Dave Hansen
2007-08-23 5:18 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-08-23 8:21 ` Greg KH [this message]
2007-08-23 13:30 ` Paulo Marques
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070823082114.GA7945@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=satyam@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox