From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763908AbXHXWHe (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:07:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760296AbXHXWHY (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:07:24 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:48629 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760015AbXHXWHX (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:07:23 -0400 From: akepner@sgi.com Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:06:20 -0700 To: David Miller Cc: jchapman@katalix.com, shemminger@linux-foundation.org, ossthema@de.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, raisch@de.ibm.com, themann@de.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, meder@de.ibm.com, tklein@de.ibm.com, stefan.roscher@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface Message-ID: <20070824220620.GU5592@sgi.com> References: <200708241747.16592.ossthema@de.ibm.com> <20070824085203.42f4305c@freepuppy.rosehill.hemminger.net> <46CF127D.1090609@katalix.com> <20070824.144711.18301866.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070824.144711.18301866.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 02:47:11PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > .... > Someone should reference that thread _now_ before this discussion goes > too far and we repeat a lot of information ...... Here's part of the thread: http://marc.info/?t=111595306000001&r=1&w=2 Also, Jamal's paper may be of interest - Google for ""when napi comes to town". -- Arthur