public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	hare@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debloat aic7xxx and aic79xx drivers by deinlining
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:21:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200708261621.30563.vda.linux@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070825145742.69b99168@laptopd505.fenrus.org>

On Saturday 25 August 2007 22:57, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 22:57:07 +0100
>
> Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Attached patch deinlines and moves big functions from .h to .c files
> > in drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/*. I also had to add prototypes for
> > ahc_lookup_scb and ahd_lookup_scb to .h files.
>
> one question... how many of these can actually be static (or would be
> if they were in their only-caller-c-file) ?

Seeing this patch ignored two or three times already,
I tried to make as non-intrusive change as possible,
thus maximizing the chances that it will be applied.

Come on, this patch saves 60k-90k of text, or 30-40% of driver size.
This is ridiculous to have such enormous bloat.

In the functions I converted there are no non-static functions
which are not declared in a .h file.

There are indeed functions which are used only in one .c file:

ahc_check_cmdcmpltqueues: aic7xxx_core.c
ahc_get_sense_bufaddr: aic7xxx_core.c
ahc_hscb_busaddr: aic7xxx_core.c
ahc_inq: aic7xxx_core.c
ahc_outq: aic7xxx_core.c
ahc_pause_bug_fix: aic7xxx_core.c
ahc_sg_bus_to_virt: aic7xxx_core.c
ahc_sg_virt_to_bus: aic7xxx_core.c
ahc_swap_with_next_hscb: aic7xxx_core.c
ahc_sync_qoutfifo: aic7xxx_core.c
ahc_sync_scb: aic7xxx_core.c
ahc_sync_tqinfifo: aic7xxx_core.c
ahc_targetcmd_offset: aic7xxx_core.c
ahc_update_residual: aic7xxx_core.c
ahd_assert_modes: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_check_cmdcmpltqueues: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_get_hescb_qoff: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_get_hnscb_qoff: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_get_sdscb_qoff: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_get_sescb_qoff: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_get_snscb_qoff: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_inl_scbram: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_inq: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_inq_scbram: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_outq: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_set_hescb_qoff: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_set_hnscb_qoff: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_set_sdscb_qoff: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_set_sescb_qoff: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_set_snscb_qoff: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_setup_data_scb: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_setup_noxfer_scb: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_setup_scb_common: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_sg_bus_to_virt: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_sg_virt_to_bus: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_swap_with_next_hscb: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_sync_qoutfifo: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_sync_scb: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_sync_sense: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_sync_tqinfifo: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_targetcmd_offset: aic79xx_core.c
ahd_update_modes: aic79xx_core.c

Converting them to static may save additional 3 or 4k,
if gcc will be smart enough...

I, too, have many questions regarding this driver:
why __inline? why u_int?... and who's maintainer, btw?

> Did you run the find static
> script or are you waiting for Adrian to do that ;-)

$ find -name '*find*static*'
$
--
vda

  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-26 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-25 21:57 [PATCH] debloat aic7xxx and aic79xx drivers by deinlining Denys Vlasenko
2007-08-25 21:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-08-26 15:21   ` Denys Vlasenko [this message]
2007-08-27  2:03     ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-28 11:56       ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-08-28 15:17         ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-08-28 19:55           ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-08-30 18:43             ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-08-30 19:02               ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-30 19:51                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-08-31 13:42                   ` Hannes Reinecke
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-07-31 10:14 Denis Vlasenko
2007-07-31  9:19 Denis Vlasenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200708261621.30563.vda.linux@googlemail.com \
    --to=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox