From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932428AbXH1Tzb (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:55:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755931AbXH1TzT (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:55:19 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.188]:9757 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753813AbXH1TzR (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:55:17 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=f8RvNvU9Ooyx0BOBrIMHrfM4FOspjMi+rfSTbx7Z82c9qEhlq+fQCffi1SU17AcpzxClcRxu1jy4YP/0nMOYnKjCxvxdC7l2WJACEWB7wi3WgYK1HjJNRB+sPIvYk5lw5RsI3qmYiH8HmY00eZoJvXHVN0R40EObLmBB6ADDM9w= From: Denys Vlasenko To: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [PATCH] debloat aic7xxx and aic79xx drivers by deinlining Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:55:06 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hare@suse.de References: <200708252257.07241.vda.linux@googlemail.com> <200708281256.35162.vda.linux@googlemail.com> <20070828081710.4687185c@laptopd505.fenrus.org> In-Reply-To: <20070828081710.4687185c@laptopd505.fenrus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200708282055.07411.vda.linux@googlemail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 28 August 2007 16:17, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:56:34 +010 > > Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > > make namespacecheck > > > > Thanks, nice tool. > > > > aic7xxx is kind of not very nice in this regard. > > > > See below what I get even on non-patched driver. > > > > I am willing to clean it up, but I still would like > > "debloating" patch to be accepted. > > Fwiw I do like your debloat patch a lot; it's just only half the > equation ... if you also do the namespace fixes, I bet the driver > debloats even more... Yes, I know, and I am happy to do that too. I just don't know whether patches will be accepted. Why this patch is not commented on by scsi people? Am I sending patches to wrong people/lists? -- vda