public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: mingo@elte.hu
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: fix broken smt/mc optimizations with CFS
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:27:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070828222718.GI1894@linux-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070827193103.GF1894@linux-os.sc.intel.com>

On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 12:31:03PM -0700, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> Essentially I observed that nice 0 tasks still endup on two cores of same
> package, with out getting spread out to two different packages. This behavior
> is same with out this fix and this fix doesn't help in any way.

Ingo, Appended patch seems to fix the issue and as far as I can test, seems ok
to me.

This is a quick fix for .23. Peter Williams and myself plan to look at
code cleanups in this area (HT/MC optimizations) post .23

BTW, with this fix, do you want to retain the current FUZZ value?

thanks,
suresh
--

Try to fix MC/HT scheduler optimization breakage again, with out breaking
the FUZZ logic.

First fix the check
	if (*imbalance + SCHED_LOAD_SCALE_FUZZ < busiest_load_per_task)
with this
	if (*imbalance < busiest_load_per_task)

As the current check is always false for nice 0 tasks (as SCHED_LOAD_SCALE_FUZZ
is same as busiest_load_per_task for nice 0 tasks).

With the above change, imbalance was getting reset to 0 in the corner case
condition, making the FUZZ logic fail. Fix it by not corrupting the
imbalance and change the imbalance, only when it finds that the
HT/MC optimization is needed.

Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
---

diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 9fe473a..03e5e8d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2511,7 +2511,7 @@ group_next:
 	 * a think about bumping its value to force at least one task to be
 	 * moved
 	 */
-	if (*imbalance + SCHED_LOAD_SCALE_FUZZ < busiest_load_per_task) {
+	if (*imbalance < busiest_load_per_task) {
 		unsigned long tmp, pwr_now, pwr_move;
 		unsigned int imbn;
 
@@ -2563,10 +2563,8 @@ small_imbalance:
 		pwr_move /= SCHED_LOAD_SCALE;
 
 		/* Move if we gain throughput */
-		if (pwr_move <= pwr_now)
-			goto out_balanced;
-
-		*imbalance = busiest_load_per_task;
+		if (pwr_move > pwr_now)
+			*imbalance = busiest_load_per_task;
 	}
 
 	return busiest;

  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-28 22:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-16  1:01 [patch] sched: fix broken smt/mc optimizations with CFS Siddha, Suresh B
2007-08-23 10:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-23 11:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-23 12:13   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-23 17:42     ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 19:19     ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-08-27 19:23       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-27 19:31         ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-08-28 22:27           ` Siddha, Suresh B [this message]
2007-08-29  3:42             ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-04 23:35             ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-09-04 23:46               ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-09-05 10:51                 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-27 16:32   ` Torsten Kaiser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070828222718.GI1894@linux-os.sc.intel.com \
    --to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox