Re: 2.6.23-rc: sched.c vs. xtensa: RSR redefined

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:

> Although it seems to pick the right version the following namespace 
> conflict should be resolved:

agreed - i've queued up the fix below.

	Ingo

------------------>
Subject: sched: fix xtensa build warning
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

rename RSR to SRR - 'RSR' is already defined on xtensa.

found by Adrian Bunk.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 kernel/sched.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Index: linux/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux/kernel/sched.c
@@ -668,7 +668,7 @@ static u64 div64_likely32(u64 divident, 
 /*
  * Shift right and round:
  */
-#define RSR(x, y) (((x) + (1UL << ((y) - 1))) >> (y))
+#define SRR(x, y) (((x) + (1UL << ((y) - 1))) >> (y))
 
 static unsigned long
 calc_delta_mine(unsigned long delta_exec, unsigned long weight,
@@ -684,10 +684,10 @@ calc_delta_mine(unsigned long delta_exec
 	 * Check whether we'd overflow the 64-bit multiplication:
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(tmp > WMULT_CONST))
-		tmp = RSR(RSR(tmp, WMULT_SHIFT/2) * lw->inv_weight,
+		tmp = SRR(SRR(tmp, WMULT_SHIFT/2) * lw->inv_weight,
 			WMULT_SHIFT/2);
 	else
-		tmp = RSR(tmp * lw->inv_weight, WMULT_SHIFT);
+		tmp = SRR(tmp * lw->inv_weight, WMULT_SHIFT);
 
 	return (unsigned long)min(tmp, (u64)(unsigned long)LONG_MAX);
 }