From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Deprecate sys_sysctl in a user space visible fashion.
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 03:44:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200709020344.51437.rob@landley.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p73lkbqvxp8.fsf@bingen.suse.de>
On Saturday 01 September 2007 5:16:03 pm Andi Kleen wrote:
> Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> writes:
> > A lot of embedded people like to configure /proc out of the kernel for
> > space reasons. This would make that noticeably more painful.
>
> I had a patch for a sysctl_name(2) for this a long time ago.
> If it was a serious issue that could be reintroduced.
>
> BTW sysctl(2) only needs to be quiet for a single sysctl used
> by glibc.
>
> -Andi
Yeah, I found it:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2003/7/10/345
I think that if /proc/sys could be broken out as a separate filesystem, and it
was small and simple, the embedded people would probably be happy. Is your
patch significantly smaller than such a filesystem would be? (Keeping in
mind that the smallest thing you can do is run from initramfs, and I think
that's pulling in libfs already...)
Rob
--
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
- Ken Thompson.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-02 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-28 22:40 [PATCH] sysctl: Deprecate sys_sysctl in a user space visible fashion Eric W. Biederman
2007-08-28 23:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-08-28 23:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-08-29 1:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-08-29 1:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-08-29 10:46 ` Alan Cox
2007-08-29 17:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-08-29 17:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-08-29 19:00 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-08-30 12:13 ` Theodore Tso
2007-08-30 13:20 ` David Newall
2007-08-30 17:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-08-29 22:51 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-30 19:32 ` Rob Landley
2007-08-30 18:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-08-30 18:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-08-30 23:22 ` Rob Landley
2007-09-01 22:16 ` Andi Kleen
2007-09-02 8:44 ` Rob Landley [this message]
2007-09-02 8:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-09-02 11:05 ` Rob Landley
2007-09-02 19:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-09-02 20:00 ` Al Viro
2007-09-02 21:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-09-03 8:37 ` Andi Kleen
2007-09-03 9:16 ` Al Viro
2007-08-29 4:49 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-30 18:56 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-08-29 4:49 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-29 5:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200709020344.51437.rob@landley.net \
--to=rob@landley.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox