public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Mau <mau@oscar.ping.de>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Hang in 2.6.23-rc5
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 08:39:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070903063904.GA1935@oscar.prima.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0709030411510.31154@enigma.security.iitk.ac.in>

On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 04:15:01AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > 
> > Try this from net-2.6 tree:
> > 
> > --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> > @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ static u32 tcp_rto_min(struct sock *sk)
> >  	struct dst_entry *dst = __sk_dst_get(sk);
> >  	u32 rto_min = TCP_RTO_MIN;
> >  
> > -	if (dst_metric_locked(dst, RTAX_RTO_MIN))
> > +	if (dst && dst_metric_locked(dst, RTAX_RTO_MIN))
> >  		rto_min = dst->metrics[RTAX_RTO_MIN-1];
> >  	return rto_min;
> >  }
> 
> That's my impression as well. That's way too core/busy a codepath to have
> a bug in. As I said earlier, almost anybody testing -rc5 is sure to hit
> this within a few hours (probably less) -- sad, it greatly erodes from the
> usefulness of -rc5 as a release candidate.

The above patch also fixed my problems using NFS mounted home directories.

I already applied it yesterday without giving any feedback, so I just
thought I should comment.

In addition I totally agree with Satyam's comment above: either
anybody is testing rc's these days, or people simply stopped reporting.

My concern is that we have to live with a git tree that has this
problem, because core developers are unavailable and nobody has the
authority to commit this fix. (That was already posted before).

I am not voting for public commit rights and personally I don't want
them anyway. It's just my observation that nothing really happens
whenever a point release is only a few days away.

Maybe most people believe that they have to wait for the 2.6.24
cycly to start before they join the discussion again ...

Patrick


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-09-03  7:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-02 18:42 Hang in 2.6.23-rc5 daryll q
2007-09-02 19:05 ` charles gagalac
2007-09-02 20:38   ` Alessandro Suardi
2007-09-02 21:26     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-09-02 21:29     ` FD Cami
2007-09-02 21:46       ` Alexey Dobriyan
2007-09-02 22:45         ` Satyam Sharma
2007-09-02 23:10           ` Alessandro Suardi
2007-09-03  6:39           ` Patrick Mau [this message]
2007-09-04  9:32             ` Romano Giannetti
2007-09-05 17:11             ` Jean Delvare
2007-09-05 22:02               ` Satyam Sharma
2007-09-08  9:37           ` FD Cami
2007-09-03 21:04         ` Robert Fitzsimons
2007-09-02 22:05     ` Richard Mittendorfer
2007-09-02 22:14       ` Jesper Juhl
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-02 20:21 Andrew

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070903063904.GA1935@oscar.prima.de \
    --to=mau@oscar.ping.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox