From: Patrick Mau <mau@oscar.ping.de>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Hang in 2.6.23-rc5
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 08:39:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070903063904.GA1935@oscar.prima.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0709030411510.31154@enigma.security.iitk.ac.in>
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 04:15:01AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> >
> > Try this from net-2.6 tree:
> >
> > --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> > @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ static u32 tcp_rto_min(struct sock *sk)
> > struct dst_entry *dst = __sk_dst_get(sk);
> > u32 rto_min = TCP_RTO_MIN;
> >
> > - if (dst_metric_locked(dst, RTAX_RTO_MIN))
> > + if (dst && dst_metric_locked(dst, RTAX_RTO_MIN))
> > rto_min = dst->metrics[RTAX_RTO_MIN-1];
> > return rto_min;
> > }
>
> That's my impression as well. That's way too core/busy a codepath to have
> a bug in. As I said earlier, almost anybody testing -rc5 is sure to hit
> this within a few hours (probably less) -- sad, it greatly erodes from the
> usefulness of -rc5 as a release candidate.
The above patch also fixed my problems using NFS mounted home directories.
I already applied it yesterday without giving any feedback, so I just
thought I should comment.
In addition I totally agree with Satyam's comment above: either
anybody is testing rc's these days, or people simply stopped reporting.
My concern is that we have to live with a git tree that has this
problem, because core developers are unavailable and nobody has the
authority to commit this fix. (That was already posted before).
I am not voting for public commit rights and personally I don't want
them anyway. It's just my observation that nothing really happens
whenever a point release is only a few days away.
Maybe most people believe that they have to wait for the 2.6.24
cycly to start before they join the discussion again ...
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-03 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-02 18:42 Hang in 2.6.23-rc5 daryll q
2007-09-02 19:05 ` charles gagalac
2007-09-02 20:38 ` Alessandro Suardi
2007-09-02 21:26 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-09-02 21:29 ` FD Cami
2007-09-02 21:46 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2007-09-02 22:45 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-09-02 23:10 ` Alessandro Suardi
2007-09-03 6:39 ` Patrick Mau [this message]
2007-09-04 9:32 ` Romano Giannetti
2007-09-05 17:11 ` Jean Delvare
2007-09-05 22:02 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-09-08 9:37 ` FD Cami
2007-09-03 21:04 ` Robert Fitzsimons
2007-09-02 22:05 ` Richard Mittendorfer
2007-09-02 22:14 ` Jesper Juhl
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-02 20:21 Andrew
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070903063904.GA1935@oscar.prima.de \
--to=mau@oscar.ping.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox