From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1757567AbXIEPW1@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757567AbXIEPW1 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 5 Sep 2007 11:22:27 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756520AbXIEPWP
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 5 Sep 2007 11:22:15 -0400
Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:41799 "EHLO
	smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752137AbXIEPWN (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 5 Sep 2007 11:22:13 -0400
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 08:15:42 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: ak@suse.de, clameter@sgi.com, steiner@sgi.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: Convert cpu_sibling_map to be a per cpu
 variable (v2) (fwd)
Message-Id: <20070905081542.dfd4f1ef.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <46DEC14C.8050001@sgi.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708312028400.24049@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
	<20070904141055.e00a60d7.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
	<46DDE623.1090402@sgi.com>
	<200709050910.10954.ak@suse.de>
	<20070905014057.bf3d2f22.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
	<46DEC14C.8050001@sgi.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.19; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 07:46:36 -0700 Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:10:10 +0100 Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
> >>> I can easily do the changes for ia64 and test them.  I don't have the
> >>> capability of testing on the powerpc.
> >> You can get cross compilers and make it compile
> > 
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/cross-compilers/
> 
> Thanks Andrew!
> 
> It's an extensive list but I didn't see one for ppc64?
> 

argh, yes, my ppc64 cross-compiler doesn't work, and I have powerpc
machines so I didn't pursue it.

Oh well. Please cc powerpc developers on the patch and if it later
breaks we can blame them :)  I'll be the first to compile and runtime
test it, so please just do a best-effort thing.