From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
josht@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tytso@us.ibm.com, dvhltc@us.ibm.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, bunk@kernel.org,
ego@in.ibm.com, oleg@tv-sign.ru, srostedt@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH RFC 0/8] RCU: Preemptible RCU
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 14:31:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070905213120.GA29204@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
Work in progress, still not for inclusion.
This is a respin of the following prior postings:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/7/276 (the four initial preemptible RCU patches)
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/17/262 (hotplug CPU for preemptible RCU)
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/22/348 (RCU priority boosting)
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/22/373 (rcutorture for RCU priority boosting)
This release adds an additional patch that makes the RCU priority booster
more friendly to power-savings measures by causing the booster task to
sleep if there is no cause to believe that priority boosting will be
required in the near future. An additional fixup and documentation patch
is forthcoming. And of course, the whole thing will be rebased to a more
recent version of Linux.
These patches take prior feedback into account, including the bit about
running checkpatch.pl. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
next reply other threads:[~2007-09-05 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-05 21:31 Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2007-09-05 21:32 ` [PATCH RFC 1/8] RCU: Split API to permit multiple RCU implementations Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-05 21:33 ` [PATCH RFC 2/8] RCU: Fix barriers Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-05 21:34 ` [PATCH RFC 3/8] RCU: Preemptible RCU Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-05 21:36 ` [PATCH RFC 4/8] RCU: synchronize_sched() workaround for CPU hotplug Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-05 21:37 ` [PATCH RFC 5/8] RCU: CPU hotplug support for preemptible RCU Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-05 21:38 ` [PATCH RFC 6/8] RCU priority boosting " Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-05 21:39 ` [PATCH RFC 7/8] RCU: rcutorture testing for RCU priority boosting Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-05 21:39 ` [PATCH RFC 8/8] RCU: Make RCU priority boosting consume less power Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070905213120.GA29204@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=josht@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tytso@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox