From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: James Corey <ploversegg@yahoo.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
Rob Sims <lkml-z@robsims.com>, Kyle Rose <krose@akamai.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sk98lin for 2.6.23-rc1
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 21:11:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070908191132.GD3563@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46E2DF74.7040307@tmr.com>
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 01:44:20PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>...
> That was with 2.6.22.5 (or so), dropped back to an old kernel with sk98lin,
> previously had uptimes in three digit days. Up for a week or so now.
There is a real long-term advantage of removing drivers like sk98lin
because it forces people to report bugs if the new driver doesn't work
instead of giving them the workaround of using the obsolete driver.
And this has the (at first sight surprising) effect that removing code
results in an improvement of the kernel.
> Haven't tried later kernels, don't intend to, while no network is really
> secure, it not really useful.
You are a regular reader of linux-kernel, and therefore the sk98lin
removal can hardly be a surprise for you. If you prefer whining over
helping to improve the kernel that's your choice...
> Bill Davidsen
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-08 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-26 15:16 sk98lin for 2.6.23-rc1 Kyle Rose
2007-07-26 16:28 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-07-26 16:30 ` Kyle Rose
2007-07-26 16:41 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-07-27 1:07 ` Kyle Rose
2007-07-26 16:57 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-07-26 22:58 ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-07-26 23:38 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-26 23:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-07-30 3:01 ` Rob Sims
2007-09-05 9:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-09-05 19:42 ` James Corey
2007-09-05 21:04 ` Kyle Rose
2007-09-05 23:00 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-09-08 17:44 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-09-08 19:11 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2007-09-09 2:42 ` Kyle Rose
2007-09-09 4:48 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-09-09 11:13 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-11 8:05 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-09-11 11:54 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-11 14:29 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-09-11 15:03 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-11 22:37 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-09-11 22:20 ` James Corey
2007-09-09 12:54 ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-11-06 22:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-11-07 1:42 ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-09-10 14:32 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-09-10 15:39 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-11 4:23 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-09-12 16:46 ` Torsten Kaiser
2007-07-26 19:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-07-26 23:52 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-27 1:13 ` Kyle Rose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070908191132.GD3563@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=krose@akamai.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml-z@robsims.com \
--cc=ploversegg@yahoo.com \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox