From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759916AbXIIUjz (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Sep 2007 16:39:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758909AbXIIUjm (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Sep 2007 16:39:42 -0400 Received: from lixom.net ([66.141.50.11]:50590 "EHLO mail.lixom.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759740AbXIIUjk (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Sep 2007 16:39:40 -0400 Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 15:40:17 -0500 From: Olof Johansson To: Adrian Bunk Cc: paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Sam Ravnborg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] powerpc: proper defconfig for crosscompiles Message-ID: <20070909204017.GA7275@lixom.net> References: <20070909182117.GJ3563@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070909182117.GJ3563@stusta.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 08:21:17PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > The trick for finding the right defconfig is neat, but you forgot to > provide an i686_defconfig. ;-) > > More seriously, cross compiling the defconfig is often useful, e.g. for > testing the compilation of patches that touch multiple architectures, > and this patch therefore chooses g5_defconfig if $(CROSS_COMPILE) is > non-empty. You should probably use ppc64_defconfig instead, since it's the "superset" config that will compile a multiplatform kernel. -Olof