From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: Cedric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
containers@lists.osdl.org,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:21:19 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070911155119.GE16222@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070911082243.9433c528.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 08:22:43AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> That looks odd, like it's a filesystem.
> What does cfs really mean?
cfs = completely fair scheduler :)
In this thread, we are talking of hooking the cfs cpu scheduler with the
task-container framework in -mm tree, so that the scheduler can deal
with groups of tasks rather than just tasks, while handling fairness of
cpu allocation.
I agree "cfs" control subsystem does look odd a bit here. "cpu" control
subsystem seems better.
--
Regards,
vatsa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-11 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-10 17:10 [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-09-10 17:05 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-09-10 17:23 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-09-10 17:22 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-10 17:41 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-09-10 17:46 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-09-10 22:28 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-09-11 4:41 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-09-11 9:53 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-09-12 11:42 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-09-12 12:10 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-09-12 16:25 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-09-13 12:33 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-09-14 9:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-14 15:59 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-09-14 16:22 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-09-10 22:37 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-09-10 22:45 ` Paul Menage
2007-09-11 7:20 ` Cedric Le Goater
2007-09-11 15:22 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-09-11 15:37 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-09-11 15:51 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
2007-09-11 15:53 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-09-11 15:44 ` Paul Menage
2007-09-10 17:28 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-09-10 17:42 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-09-10 18:38 ` [Devel] " Paul Menage
2007-09-11 4:44 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-09-18 8:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-09-18 10:44 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070911155119.GE16222@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=clg@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=jengelh@computergmbh.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox