From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932378AbXIKVke (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:40:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754228AbXIKVkO (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:40:14 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.172]:27120 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754028AbXIKVkM (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:40:12 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-disposition:message-id:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Ae5hsHouEpjS2SXxUpstaItL3zQqCN5Z1cDbCCE7xdweCvWnoeXre9LDcMMn11t9Wfcs58r9He/Wa+t9XMK/GCHJmqNNvMy0o6SBNyGUeAfgVQegOXAer44oQPQLNeh4owaEvtxQojWqbrRWC9SdATQkOC0mca55I01XGkNFUQU= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ide: make ide_rate_filter() also respect PIO and SW/MW DMA mode masks (take 2) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 22:52:02 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200709022344.18565.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> <46E2900D.5010004@ru.mvista.com> In-Reply-To: <46E2900D.5010004@ru.mvista.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200709112252.02576.bzolnier@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Saturday 08 September 2007, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Once I quothed: > > > Make ide_rate_filter() also respect PIO/SWDMA/MWDMA mode masks. While at it, > > make the udma_filter() method calls take precedence over using the mode masks. > > This one not looking to pretty -- I've geve some thought on how to > beautify all these switch fallthoughs but haven't got something much better > then uour original approach (AKA Occam's razor :-). Care to recast the patch to contain only udma_filter() part? BTW ide_rate_filter() still lacks respecting PIO limits of the device (Occam's razor doesn't apply to "PIO side" of ide_rate_filter() ;-) Thanks, Bart