public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ACPI video mode patch review
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:04:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200709170004.06095.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070916205922.GI11983@elf.ucw.cz>

On Sunday, 16 September 2007 22:59, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > > Many thanks for taking care of this!
> > > 
> > > We already have a patch in -mm, s2ram-kill-old-debugging-junk.patch from Pavel
> > > (http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm-commits&m=118737955611331&w=1), that removes the
> > > #ifdefed blocks and it clashes with your first patch a bit.
> > > 
> > > FYI, I have rebased your first patch on top of the Pavel's patch:
> > > http://www.sisk.pl/kernel/hibernation_and_suspend/2.6.23-rc6/patches/39-acpi-video-mode-fix.patch
> > > 
> > 
> > Thanks Rafael,
> > 
> > However, I need to send something upstream to Linus for this kernel
> > cycle, so I don't want to base it on an -mm patch.  There are two
> > alternatives, obviously: 1. send my patch in now based on the "change as
> > little as necessary to fix the immediate problem" and then rebase
> > Pavel's patch on top of mine, or 2. for me to send both Pavel's patch
> > and the rebased patch upstream.
> > 
> > Personally, I would prefer to avoid strategy 2 at this late stage in the
> > 2.6.23-rc series.
> 
> Agreed we should have the fix in 2.6.23... Actually doing 2 does not
> seem like a big problem, my patch is pretty straight cleanup (and may
> even fix some machines, as we avoid touching video ram)... But
> resolving conflict is not hard, either; I know, I did it :-).

OK, let's take path 1, then.

Greetings,
Rafael

  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-16 21:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-13 21:37 ACPI video mode patch review H. Peter Anvin
2007-09-13 23:23 ` Jeff Chua
2007-09-14  9:25 ` Pavel Machek
2007-09-16 20:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-09-16 20:53   ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-09-16 20:59     ` Pavel Machek
2007-09-16 22:04       ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2007-09-20 14:19 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-09-20 14:22   ` Jeff Chua
2007-09-20 14:37     ` Jiri Kosina
2007-09-20 14:51       ` Jeff Chua

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200709170004.06095.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox