From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755270AbXIQOac (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2007 10:30:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754215AbXIQOaZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2007 10:30:25 -0400 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:33989 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754189AbXIQOaY (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2007 10:30:24 -0400 From: Andi Kleen Organization: SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Nuernberg, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) To: "Huang, Ying" Subject: Re: [RFC -mm 0/2] i386/x86_64 boot: 32-bit boot protocol Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:30:17 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , "Eric W. Biederman" , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Yinghai Lu , Chandramouli Narayanan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1190017572.5866.20.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> <200709171040.27043.ak@suse.de> <1190018855.5866.27.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1190018855.5866.27.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200709171630.18066.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > The real contents of 32-bit boot protocol patch is is in another 2 mails > with the title: > > [RFC -mm 1/2] i386/x86_64 boot: setup data > [RFC -mm 2/2] i386/x86_64 boot: document for 32 bit boot protocol > > The EFI patch in this mail is just an example of 32-bit boot protocol > usage. Please write meaningfull descriptions for each patch then. Just duplicating the same in each is pretty useless. -Andi