Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 09:45:59PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
> > The copy list, removed by Ingo is restored. Playing fair game, Willy!
> 
> Sorry Oleg, I don't understand why you added me to this thread. And I 
> don't understand at all what your intent was :-/
> 
> I've left others Cc too since they wonder like me.

i'm wondering too.

in my posted debugging answer, instead of replying privately to Rob, i 
have also Cc:-ed lkml and ck-list. (perhaps i shouldnt even have Cc:-ed 
the lists, as my posted debugging questions and suggestions were mostly 
relevant to Rob and to me - but it's better to keep such things archived 
on the lists, if someone wants to read them. In the first mail i also 
Cc:-ed Mike and Peter who changed the scheduler recently - but i dropped 
them after my first reply when it became apparent that it's not their 
changes that are affected. With all lists still Cc:-ed, so that people 
can follow it if they really want to.)

I'd expect any new results to be posted by Rob to everyone he wishes to 
send them to - like he did it in the past.

Or is Oleg perhaps complaining about the fact that i Cc:-ed this back to 
both affected email lists, for everyone to read? Would be a weird 
argument.

	Ingo