From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.22.6] nfsd: fh_verify() `malloc failure' with lots of free memory leads to NFS hang
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:12:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070918011257.GC2443@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zlzkkfvk.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix>
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 12:54:07AM +0100, Nix wrote:
> The code which calls new_do_write() looks like this:
>
> ,----[ libio/fileops.c:_IO_new_file_xsputn() ]
> | if (do_write)
> | {
> | count = new_do_write (f, s, do_write);
> | to_do -= count;
> | if (count < do_write)
> | return n - to_do;
> | }
> `----
>
> This code handles partial writes followed by errors by returning a
> suitable nonzero value, and immediate errors by returning -1.
>
> In either case the buffer will have been filled as much as possible by
> that point, and will still be filled when (vf)printf() is next called.
OK, I'm a little lost at this point (what's n? What's to_do?), but I'll
take your word for it.
I'd be kinda curious when exactly the behavior changed and why.
Also I suppose we should check which version of nfs-utils that fix is in
and make sure distributions are getting the fixed nfs-utils before they
get the new libc, or we're going to see this bug a lot....
> This behaviour is, IIRC, mandated by the C Standard: I can find no
> reference in the Standard to streams being flushed on error, only
> on fclose(), fflush(), or program termination.
OK!
Let me know if the problem's fixed.
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-18 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-17 22:23 [2.6.22.6] nfsd: fh_verify() `malloc failure' with lots of free memory leads to NFS hang Nix
2007-09-17 22:36 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-09-17 23:54 ` Nix
2007-09-18 1:12 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2007-09-18 6:18 ` Nix
2007-09-21 18:46 ` Nix
2007-09-21 21:13 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070918011257.GC2443@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nix@esperi.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox