From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/7] Immediate Values - i386 Optimization
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:01:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070919130122.GA21750@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46F050E8.5020206@goop.org>
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge (jeremy@goop.org) wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Allowing different registers should be doable, but if so, one would have
> > to put 0: at the *end* of the instruction and use (0f)-4 instead, since
> > the non-%eax forms are one byte longer.
> >
>
> OK, that's already a problem since its using "=r" as the constraint.
>
> > This also seems "safer", since an imm32 is always the last thing in the
> > instruction.
>
> Good idea. If gas/gcc generates entirely the wrong addressing mode,
> then we've got bigger problems.
>
Ok, let's have a good look at what we want:
1 - get a pointer to the beginning of the immediate value within the
instruction.
2 - make sure that the immediate value, within the instruction, is
written to atomically wrt all CPUs, even on older architectures
where non aligned writes are not atomic.
Effectively, placing a label at the end of the instruction, and then
offsetting backward from there, will give us (1).
Then, for the alignment, we have to give a good look at the instruction
set reference, mov instruction, to see what the variants of mov
immediate value to register are on i386.
First, let's look at the possible prefixes:
- Lock and repeat prefixes : no
- Segment override prefixes: no memory reference there, so doesn't
apply.
- Branch hints : no, it's a mov instruction
- Operand-size override prefix: *yes*, can be used for 2 bytes mov
- Address-size override prefix: no address in there, only immediate
value and register.
(looking at the Compat/Leg Mode)
3 cases:
* 1 byte
B0 + rb MOV r8, imm8 (1 byte opcode)
REX + B0 + rb MOV r8, imm8 (only on 64 bits archs, never generated)
C6 /0 MOV r/m8, imm8 (2 bytes opcode)
(this one doesn't require alignment at all, since we do a 1 byte write)
* 2 bytes
B8 + rw MOV r16, imm16 (1 byte opcode)
66 B8 + rd MOV r16, imm16 (2 bytes opcode) (with 66H prefix)
C7 /0 MOV r/m16, imm16 (2 bytes opcode)
(Alignment on 4 bytes boundaries would be required because of the
possible 1 byte opcode ? Or is the 66H prefix mandatory there ? If it
is, then we can safely align on 2 bytes boundaries.)
* 4 bytes
B8 + rd MOV r32, imm32 (1 byte opcode)
C7 /0 MOV r/m32, imm32 (2 bytes opcode)
(the 2 bytes opcode can be a problem)
I have missed anything ?
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-19 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-18 21:07 [patch 0/7] Immediate Values for 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-18 21:07 ` [patch 1/7] Immediate Values - Architecture Independent Code Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-18 21:07 ` [patch 2/7] Immediate Values - Kconfig menu in EMBEDDED Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-18 22:02 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-09-19 11:13 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-18 21:07 ` [patch 3/7] Immediate Values - Move Kprobes i386 restore_interrupt to kdebug.h Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-18 21:07 ` [patch 4/7] Immediate Values - i386 Optimization Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-18 21:51 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-09-18 22:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-09-18 22:27 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-09-19 13:01 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2007-09-19 16:03 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-19 16:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-09-19 17:30 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-09-19 17:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-09-19 18:31 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-19 18:22 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-10-20 16:47 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-10-20 18:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-10-22 15:40 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-10-22 16:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-10-22 9:53 ` Andi Kleen
2007-09-19 11:00 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-18 22:14 ` Andi Kleen
2007-09-18 22:29 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-09-18 22:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-09-18 22:44 ` Andi Kleen
2007-09-19 11:08 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-19 11:14 ` Andi Kleen
2007-09-19 10:59 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-20 10:24 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-21 13:31 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-18 21:07 ` [patch 5/7] Immediate Values - Powerpc Optimization Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-18 21:07 ` [patch 6/7] Immediate Values - Documentation Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-18 21:07 ` [patch 7/7] Scheduler Profiling - Use Immediate Values Mathieu Desnoyers
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-17 18:42 [patch 0/7] " Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-17 18:42 ` [patch 4/7] Immediate Values - i386 Optimization Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-18 6:04 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070919130122.GA21750@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox