From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: fix to use invalid sched_class
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 23:37:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070919213715.GA14086@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46F19148.4090404@ct.jp.nec.com>
* Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> I found an issue about the scheduler.
> If you need a test case, please let me know.
> Here is a patch.
>
> When using rt_mutex, a NULL pointer dereference is occurred at
> enqueue_task_rt. Here is a scenario;
> 1) there are two threads, the thread A is fair_sched_class and
> thread B is rt_sched_class.
> 2) Thread A is boosted up to rt_sched_class, because the thread A
> has a rt_mutex lock and the thread B is waiting the lock.
> 3) At this time, when thread A create a new thread C, the thread
> C has a rt_sched_class.
> 4) When doing wake_up_new_task() for the thread C, the priority
> of the thread C is out of the RT priority range, because the
> normal priority of thread A is not the RT priority. It makes
> data corruption by overflowing the rt_prio_array.
> The new thread C should be fair_sched_class.
>
> The new thread should be valid scheduler class before queuing.
> This patch fixes to set the suitable scheduler class.
Nice fix! It's a 2.6.23 must-have fix - i'll push it out into the
scheduler tree. Thanks!
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-19 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-19 21:14 [PATCH] sched: fix to use invalid sched_class Hiroshi Shimamoto
2007-09-19 21:37 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-19 22:05 Dmitry Adamushko
2007-09-20 0:01 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2007-09-20 7:17 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070919213715.GA14086@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox