public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What's in linux-2.6-block.git for 2.6.24
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 02:15:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070921021505.99c37589.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070921085711.GG2367@kernel.dk>

On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 10:57:11 +0200 Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> This details the contents of the block git repo of items that are bound
> for a 2.6.24 merge. The SCSI data buffer accessor patch from Tomo will
> also be going in through the block tree, but it's not merged up yet.
> That's mainly due to my laziness, not because the code isn't ready. That
> will happen sometime during today.
> 
> Misc bits:
> - Various bug fixes from Neil Brown, part of his larger patchset for
>   allowing arbitrarily sized bios.
> - Various little bug fixes and documentation updates.
> 
> Barriers:
> - The empty bio barrier patches from me. These allow sending down a bio
>   with no data attached, for insertion a barrier in a request queue.
>   They are useful for dm and md, but also cleans up the sync
>   blkdev_issue_flush() interface - it's now no longer an addon hack, but
>   just a natural use of empty bio barriers.

That sounds useful.

> SG chaining bits:
> - This is the bulk of the patchset. It consists of three major
>   components:
> 
>         - sglist-core, which add helpers for iterating sg lists and
>           switches the block layer and SCSI to use those. Should not
>           have any functional changes.
>         - sglist-drivers, which converts drivers to use the sg list
>           helpers. Again, should not contain functional changes.
>         - sglist-arch, which adds support to most architectures and
>           actually enables sg chaining.
> 
> The goal of sg chaining is to allow support for very large sgtables,
> without requiring that they be allocated from one contigious piece of
> memory.

Presumably sg chaining means more overhead on the IO submission paths?  If
so, has this been quantified?


  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-21  9:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-21  8:57 What's in linux-2.6-block.git for 2.6.24 Jens Axboe
2007-09-21  9:15 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-09-21  9:24   ` Jens Axboe
2007-09-21  9:36     ` Jens Axboe
2007-09-23 13:19 ` Torsten Kaiser
2007-09-23 13:55   ` FUJITA Tomonori
2007-09-23 15:31     ` Torsten Kaiser
2007-09-24 18:48       ` Torsten Kaiser
2007-09-25  5:52         ` Torsten Kaiser
2007-09-23 14:11   ` Alan Cox
2007-09-23 15:40     ` Torsten Kaiser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070921021505.99c37589.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox