From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760926AbXIUSLc (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:11:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753275AbXIUSLZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:11:25 -0400 Received: from tomts13.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.34]:57591 "EHLO tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752726AbXIUSLZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:11:25 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:11:22 -0400 From: Mathieu Desnoyers To: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 00/11] Text Edit Lock for 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 Message-ID: <20070921181122.GA30045@Krystal> References: <20070918210601.028313546@polymtl.ca> <20070920161018.0b4e7ec3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070921172950.GA22972@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070921172950.GA22972@infradead.org> X-Editor: vi X-Info: http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080 X-Operating-System: Linux/2.6.21.3-grsec (i686) X-Uptime: 14:11:05 up 53 days, 18:29, 4 users, load average: 0.81, 0.66, 0.63 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Christoph Hellwig (hch@infradead.org) wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 04:10:18PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:06:01 -0400 > > Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > > > > Here are the text edit lock patches ported to 2.6.23-rc6-mm1. > > > > I think I'll duck these one more time. There was a bit of followup > > and for now I'd prefer to concentrate on obviously-safe stuff and > > stabilisation of the current 2.6.24 queue. > > As much as I'd love to see markers as soon as possible I have to agree. > > I really hate how the first post of a handfull easy patches touching > almost no core code has turned into this gigantic series. > > Matthew, any chance you could resurrect a trivial, no-optimizations > marker variant that has so little impact it could go into 2.6.24? > > I'd really love to have the infrastructure there so we can add optimizations > in parallel with actually adding the users to the tree. Sure, I'll prepare that. -- Mathieu Desnoyers Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68