public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vitaliy Gusev <vgusev@openvz.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: Problem: LTP linkat01 test fails on nfs directory (NFS v3)
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:39:35 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200709211839.35883.vgusev@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1190378227.6680.10.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>

On the Friday 21 September 2007 16:37 Trond Myklebust, wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 13:13 +0400, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > Tested kernels: 2.6.18, 2.6.22, 2.6.23-rc2
> >
> > Steps to reproduce: Suppose that we have mounted some directory from nfs
> > v3 server with default options. Also we  have the two directories in this
> > mountpoint and each directory has hard linked file. Try to open those
> > files and write to one and read from another. Data will not be equal.
> > (Testcase: attached hardlink_test.c)
>
> Please retry after re-exporting the filesystem using the highly
> recommended "no_subtree_check" option. The default subtree_check option
> is broken: it changes the filehandle of the file upon a cross-directory
> rename() of that file.

Ok, problem goes out. Default option depends on nfs-utils release.

> >
> > Please explain why nfs_find_actor() function compares file handles?
>
> 'cos this is the only way to know that two files are the same. fileid is
> not always supported by servers: it is an optional NFSv4 attribute, and

>From RFC3010 ( NFSv4 ) section 2.4.1 :
   "For example, if paths /a/b/c and /a/d/c refer to the same file, the       
server SHOULD return the same filehandle for both path names traversals".

For NFSv4  problem should not be shown.

> on NFSv3, most non-posix filesystems will fake it using something like
> iunique().
>
> Comparing filehandles allows you to be certain that two files are the
> same if the filehandles are equal. If they are not equal, then that does
> not guarantee that the files are different, but then how else are you
> going to determine it?
>

-- 
Thanks,
Vitaliy Gusev


  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-21 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <46F1541B.2040800@sw.ru>
2007-09-21  9:13 ` Problem: LTP linkat01 test fails on nfs directory (NFS v3) Vitaliy Gusev
2007-09-21 12:37   ` Trond Myklebust
2007-09-21 14:39     ` Vitaliy Gusev [this message]
2007-09-21 10:16 ` Vitaliy Gusev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200709211839.35883.vgusev@openvz.org \
    --to=vgusev@openvz.org \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox