From: Vitaliy Gusev <vgusev@openvz.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: Problem: LTP linkat01 test fails on nfs directory (NFS v3)
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:39:35 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200709211839.35883.vgusev@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1190378227.6680.10.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
On the Friday 21 September 2007 16:37 Trond Myklebust, wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 13:13 +0400, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > Tested kernels: 2.6.18, 2.6.22, 2.6.23-rc2
> >
> > Steps to reproduce: Suppose that we have mounted some directory from nfs
> > v3 server with default options. Also we have the two directories in this
> > mountpoint and each directory has hard linked file. Try to open those
> > files and write to one and read from another. Data will not be equal.
> > (Testcase: attached hardlink_test.c)
>
> Please retry after re-exporting the filesystem using the highly
> recommended "no_subtree_check" option. The default subtree_check option
> is broken: it changes the filehandle of the file upon a cross-directory
> rename() of that file.
Ok, problem goes out. Default option depends on nfs-utils release.
> >
> > Please explain why nfs_find_actor() function compares file handles?
>
> 'cos this is the only way to know that two files are the same. fileid is
> not always supported by servers: it is an optional NFSv4 attribute, and
>From RFC3010 ( NFSv4 ) section 2.4.1 :
"For example, if paths /a/b/c and /a/d/c refer to the same file, the
server SHOULD return the same filehandle for both path names traversals".
For NFSv4 problem should not be shown.
> on NFSv3, most non-posix filesystems will fake it using something like
> iunique().
>
> Comparing filehandles allows you to be certain that two files are the
> same if the filehandles are equal. If they are not equal, then that does
> not guarantee that the files are different, but then how else are you
> going to determine it?
>
--
Thanks,
Vitaliy Gusev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-21 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <46F1541B.2040800@sw.ru>
2007-09-21 9:13 ` Problem: LTP linkat01 test fails on nfs directory (NFS v3) Vitaliy Gusev
2007-09-21 12:37 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-09-21 14:39 ` Vitaliy Gusev [this message]
2007-09-21 10:16 ` Vitaliy Gusev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200709211839.35883.vgusev@openvz.org \
--to=vgusev@openvz.org \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox