From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@sw.ru>,
akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move kasprintf.o to obj-y
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:09:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070924080948.GA8525@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070924075949.GA1742@uranus.ravnborg.org>
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 09:59:49AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > Please kill lib-y while you're at it. It's useless and a constant
> > source of pain like this.
> Kernel-bloat is another "constant source of pain".
> But the troubles are that increased blot does not result in compiler erros.
>
> And your proposal to kil lib-y is a counter-act here.
Killing lib-y doesn't create kernel bloat if done right. Just introduce
proper Kconfig dependencies for the truely optional parts. But if you
look at the list of objects in lib-y you'll see that they fall in basically
three categories:
(1) always used by core code - should be obj-y
(2) generic implementation for arch-specific functionality, should be
guarded by Kconfig for clarity reasons anyway
(3) library code often but not always used by code that's not always
built in. Here we run into the move to obj-y to avoid compiler
warning when used as module issue all the time. Adding a CONFIG
for the bigger onces actually avoids bloat over obj-y here, and
when it's small enough obj-y is a lot safer in the presence of
modular users
Really, trying to use the old static library use on demand concept simply
doesn't fit the way the kernel is built with it's modules and dependencies.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-24 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-24 7:18 [PATCH] Move kasprintf.o to obj-y Alexey Dobriyan
2007-09-24 7:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-09-24 7:59 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-09-24 8:09 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2007-09-24 8:21 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-24 8:29 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070924080948.GA8525@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=adobriyan@sw.ru \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox