public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jfannin@gmail.com (Joseph Fannin)
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	nigel@suspend2.net, "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@cmu.edu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Kexec Mailing List <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2 -mm] kexec based hibernation -v3: kexec jump
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:30:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070926203036.GF31759@nineveh.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070921094512.GA20149@elf.ucw.cz>

On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:45:12AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> > >
> > > Sounds doable, as long as you can cope with long command lines (which
> > > shouldn't be a biggie). (If you've got a swapfile or parts of a swap
> > > partition already in use, it can be quite fragmented).
> >
> > Hmm.  This is an interesting problem.  Sharing a swap file or a swap
> > partition with the actual swap of user space pages does seem to be
> > a limitation of this approach.
> >
> > Although the fact that it is simple to write to a separate file may
> > be a reasonable compensation.
>
> I'm not sure how you'd write it to a separate file. Notice that kjump
> kernel may not mount journalling filesystems, not even
> read-only. (Ext3 replays journal in that case). You could pass block
> numbers from the original kernel...

    The ext3 thing is a bug, the case for which I don't think has been
adequately explained to the ext[34] folks.  There should be at least a
no_replay mount flag available, or something.  It has ramifications
for more than just hibernation.

    And yeah, I'm gonna bring up the swap files thing again.  If you
can hibernate to a swap file, you can hibernate to a dedicated
hibernation file, and vice versa.

    If you can't hibernate to a swap file, then swap files are
effectively unsupported for any system you might want to hibernate.
<handwave> I wonder what embedded folks would think about that
</handwave>.

    But, in my ignorance, I'm not sure even fixing the ext3 bug will
guarantee you consistent metadata so that you can handle a
swap/hibernate file.  You can do a sync(), but how do you make that
not race against running processes without the freezer, or blkdev
snapshots?

    I guess uswsusp and the-patch-previously-known-as-suspend2 handle
this somehow, though.

   (It's that same ignorance that has me waiting for someone with
established credit with kernel people to make that argument for the
ext3 bug, so I can hang my own reasons for thinking that it's bad off
of theirs).

--
Joseph Fannin
jfannin@gmail.com


  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-26 20:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-20  5:34 [RFC][PATCH 1/2 -mm] kexec based hibernation -v3: kexec jump Huang, Ying
2007-09-20 10:09 ` Pavel Machek
2007-09-21  0:24   ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-09-21  1:06     ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-21  1:19       ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-09-21  1:41         ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-21  1:57           ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-09-21  2:18             ` Huang, Ying
2007-09-21  2:25               ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-09-21  2:45                 ` Huang, Ying
2007-09-21  2:58                   ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-09-21  4:46                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-09-21  9:45                       ` Pavel Machek
2007-09-26 20:30                         ` Joseph Fannin [this message]
2007-09-26 20:52                           ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-09-27  6:33                           ` Huang, Ying
2007-09-27  6:35                             ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-09-22 22:02                   ` Alon Bar-Lev
2007-09-21  3:33             ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-09-21 12:09               ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-09-21 13:14                 ` huang ying
2007-09-21 14:31                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-09-21 15:02                     ` huang ying
2007-09-21 15:50                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-09-21 18:11                     ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2007-09-21 19:00                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-09-21 19:45                         ` Alan Stern
2007-09-21 20:15                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-09-21 20:26                             ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2007-09-21 20:53                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-09-21 21:08                                 ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2007-09-21 21:25                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-09-21 21:16                                     ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2007-09-21 23:19                                       ` Kyle Moffett
2007-09-21 23:47                                         ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-09-22 10:40                                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-10-11 20:54                                             ` Pavel Machek
2007-10-24 20:38                                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-09-22 10:34                                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-09-22 18:00                                           ` Kyle Moffett
2007-09-22 21:51                                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-09-26 20:52                                               ` Joseph Fannin
2007-09-21  4:16             ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-21 11:56           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-09-21 11:58             ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-09-21 12:18               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-09-21 12:15                 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-09-21 13:25             ` huang ying
2007-09-24 17:37       ` Thomas Meyer
2007-09-21  9:49     ` Pavel Machek
2007-09-21 12:10       ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-09-21  2:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-09-21  7:27   ` Huang, Ying
2007-09-21  4:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-09-21  8:42   ` Huang, Ying

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070926203036.GF31759@nineveh.local \
    --to=jfannin@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jbms@cmu.edu \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=nigel@suspend2.net \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox