From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: David Newall <david@davidnewall.com>,
Christer Weinigel <christer@weinigel.se>,
Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com>, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>,
majkls <majkls@prepere.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 04:59:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070927035925.GT8181@ftp.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070927000137.GV6800@stusta.de>
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 02:01:37AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> <-- snip -->
>
> Look, when chroot was being designed, I think they intended that even root
> should be unable to get out. They went so far as to say that dot-dot
> wouldn't let you out; and it doesn't.
>
> <-- snip -->
>
> You were clearly saying that whom you call "they" were the people who
> designed chroot. And it was you who was claiming in this statement that
> "they" said it.
>
> The OpenBSD manpage you quoted in this thread states chroot() was added
> in 4.2BSD, and 4.2BSD was released in 1983.
>
> You should therefore either bring a source where the people who designed
> chroot() in 1983 or earlier are stating what you claim they said or
> admit that you were talking utter bullshit.
chroot() is present in v7, thank you very much. /usr/sys/sys/sys4.c has
chdir()
{
chdirec(&u.u_cdir);
}
chroot()
{
if (suser())
chdirec(&u.u_rdir);
}
and back then it didn't stop lookups by .. at all - u_rdir is only used
in the beginning of namei() (when pathname starts with /), plus the obvious
refcounting in exit()/newproc(). So give me a break - back when it had
been introduced, it didn't do anything jail-like _at_ _all_.
That check appears only in BSD:
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* vfs_lookup.c 4.4 03/06/81 */
+/* vfs_lookup.c 4.5 81/03/09 */
#include "../h/param.h"
#include "../h/systm.h"
@@ -107,6 +107,9 @@
u.u_segflg = 1;
eo = 0;
bp = NULL;
+ if (dp == u.u_rdir && u.u_dent.d_name[0] == '.' &&
+ u.u_dent.d_name[1] == '.' && u.u_dent.d_name[2] == 0)
+ goto cloop;
eloop:
with spectaculary lousy commit message ("lint and a minor fixed") by
wnj. Feel free to ask Bill Joy WTF he had intended. At a guess,
more consistent behaviour in chrooted environment (i.e. pathname
resolution looking as if the subtree had been everything).
To talk about root-safety of _anything_ at that point is bloody ridiculous.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-27 3:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-19 7:19 sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix majkls
2007-09-19 9:40 ` Alan Cox
2007-09-19 18:27 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-09-19 18:45 ` Alan Cox
2007-09-19 22:24 ` David Newall
2007-09-21 17:39 ` Phillip Susi
2007-09-21 18:10 ` Alan Cox
2007-09-25 20:53 ` Phillip Susi
2007-09-26 0:23 ` Al Viro
2007-09-26 10:34 ` David Newall
2007-09-26 11:21 ` Alan Cox
2007-09-26 11:22 ` David Newall
2007-09-26 11:38 ` Alan Cox
2007-09-26 11:56 ` David Newall
2007-09-26 14:10 ` Alan Cox
2007-09-26 15:03 ` Chris Adams
2007-09-26 16:54 ` David Newall
2007-09-26 17:04 ` Alan Cox
2007-09-26 17:18 ` David Newall
2007-09-26 17:29 ` Alan Cox
2007-09-26 17:28 ` David Newall
2007-09-26 18:40 ` Al Viro
2007-09-26 19:24 ` Christer Weinigel
2007-09-26 21:19 ` David Newall
2007-09-26 21:55 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-26 23:35 ` David Newall
2007-09-27 0:01 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-27 3:59 ` Al Viro [this message]
2007-09-27 6:42 ` David Newall
2007-09-27 6:53 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-27 7:28 ` Christer Weinigel
2007-09-27 11:23 ` Theodore Tso
2007-09-27 14:36 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-09-28 1:06 ` David Newall
[not found] <952DN-83o-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <954cl-29C-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <95ctn-74b-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <95cMH-7um-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <95gdA-4OZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
2007-09-20 11:13 ` Bodo Eggert
2007-09-20 11:59 ` Philipp Marek
2007-09-20 12:52 ` majkls
2007-09-20 16:06 ` David Newall
2007-09-20 16:17 ` Philipp Marek
2007-09-20 18:02 ` David Newall
2007-09-20 20:53 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-09-21 8:29 ` David Newall
2007-09-24 21:32 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-09-24 22:04 ` David Newall
2007-09-24 23:00 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-09-25 7:45 ` David Newall
2007-09-25 11:49 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-09-25 13:58 ` David Newall
2007-09-24 23:02 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <95UE2-1oR-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <95V72-2ly-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <97pG8-3B5-47@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <97sX2-p1-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
2007-09-26 9:38 ` Nick Craig-Wood
[not found] <fa.1U6+49SWHSlhuK5/3PBckFWAbXU@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.WASh5K8oOF4DAq3sSYtIlWNCdWQ@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.X6MeYG+PmN8/e5zfGij80quLaws@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa./eIdqiAY0Mx9xHl6ESobHaLKJBM@ifi.uio.no>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070927035925.GT8181@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=christer@weinigel.se \
--cc=david@davidnewall.com \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=majkls@prepere.com \
--cc=psusi@cfl.rr.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox