public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH -mm] intel-iommu sg chaining support
@ 2007-09-29 12:16 FUJITA Tomonori
  2007-10-01 16:12 ` Keshavamurthy, Anil S
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: FUJITA Tomonori @ 2007-09-29 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, anil.s.keshavamurthy; +Cc: linux-kernel, jens.axboe, fujita.tomonori

x86_64 defines ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN. So if IOMMU implementations don't
support sg chaining, we will get data corruption.

Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
---
 drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c |   32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
index dab329f..4668995 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
@@ -1963,7 +1963,7 @@ static void intel_free_coherent(struct device *hwdev, size_t size,
 }
 
 #define SG_ENT_VIRT_ADDRESS(sg)	(page_address((sg)->page) + (sg)->offset)
-static void intel_unmap_sg(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
+static void intel_unmap_sg(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sglist,
 	int nelems, int dir)
 {
 	int i;
@@ -1973,16 +1973,17 @@ static void intel_unmap_sg(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
 	struct iova *iova;
 	size_t size = 0;
 	void *addr;
+	struct scatterlist *sg;
 
 	if (pdev->sysdata == DUMMY_DEVICE_DOMAIN_INFO)
 		return;
 
 	domain = find_domain(pdev);
 
-	iova = find_iova(&domain->iovad, IOVA_PFN(sg[0].dma_address));
+	iova = find_iova(&domain->iovad, IOVA_PFN(sglist[0].dma_address));
 	if (!iova)
 		return;
-	for (i = 0; i < nelems; i++, sg++) {
+	for_each_sg(sglist, sg, nelems, i) {
 		addr = SG_ENT_VIRT_ADDRESS(sg);
 		size += aligned_size((u64)addr, sg->length);
 	}
@@ -2003,20 +2004,20 @@ static void intel_unmap_sg(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
 }
 
 static int intel_nontranslate_map_sg(struct device *hddev,
-	struct scatterlist *sg, int nelems, int dir)
+	struct scatterlist *sglist, int nelems, int dir)
 {
 	int i;
+	struct scatterlist *sg;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < nelems; i++) {
-		struct scatterlist *s = &sg[i];
-		BUG_ON(!s->page);
-		s->dma_address = virt_to_bus(SG_ENT_VIRT_ADDRESS(s));
-		s->dma_length = s->length;
+	for_each_sg(sglist, sg, nelems, i) {
+		BUG_ON(!sg->page);
+		sg->dma_address = virt_to_bus(SG_ENT_VIRT_ADDRESS(sg));
+		sg->dma_length = sg->length;
 	}
 	return nelems;
 }
 
-static int intel_map_sg(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
+static int intel_map_sg(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sglist,
 	int nelems, int dir)
 {
 	void *addr;
@@ -2028,18 +2029,18 @@ static int intel_map_sg(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
 	size_t offset = 0;
 	struct iova *iova = NULL;
 	int ret;
-	struct scatterlist *orig_sg = sg;
+	struct scatterlist *sg;
 	unsigned long start_addr;
 
 	BUG_ON(dir == DMA_NONE);
 	if (pdev->sysdata == DUMMY_DEVICE_DOMAIN_INFO)
-		return intel_nontranslate_map_sg(hwdev, sg, nelems, dir);
+		return intel_nontranslate_map_sg(hwdev, sglist, nelems, dir);
 
 	domain = get_valid_domain_for_dev(pdev);
 	if (!domain)
 		return 0;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < nelems; i++, sg++) {
+	for_each_sg(sglist, sg, nelems, i) {
 		addr = SG_ENT_VIRT_ADDRESS(sg);
 		addr = (void *)virt_to_phys(addr);
 		size += aligned_size((u64)addr, sg->length);
@@ -2047,7 +2048,7 @@ static int intel_map_sg(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
 
 	iova = __intel_alloc_iova(hwdev, domain, size);
 	if (!iova) {
-		orig_sg->dma_length = 0;
+		sglist->dma_length = 0;
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -2063,8 +2064,7 @@ static int intel_map_sg(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
 
 	start_addr = iova->pfn_lo << PAGE_SHIFT_4K;
 	offset = 0;
-	sg = orig_sg;
-	for (i = 0; i < nelems; i++, sg++) {
+	for_each_sg(sglist, sg, nelems, i) {
 		addr = SG_ENT_VIRT_ADDRESS(sg);
 		addr = (void *)virt_to_phys(addr);
 		size = aligned_size((u64)addr, sg->length);
-- 
1.5.2.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH -mm] intel-iommu sg chaining support
  2007-09-29 12:16 [PATCH -mm] intel-iommu sg chaining support FUJITA Tomonori
@ 2007-10-01 16:12 ` Keshavamurthy, Anil S
  2007-10-03 21:12   ` Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Keshavamurthy, Anil S @ 2007-10-01 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: FUJITA Tomonori
  Cc: akpm, Keshavamurthy, Anil S, linux-kernel, jens.axboe,
	fujita.tomonori

On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 05:16:38AM -0700, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> 
>    x86_64 defines ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN. So if IOMMU implementations don't
>    support sg chaining, we will get data corruption.
>    Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>

Acked-by: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>

>    ---
>     drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c |   32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
>     1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>    diff --git a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
>    index dab329f..4668995 100644
>    --- a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
>    +++ b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
>    @@ -1963,7 +1963,7 @@ static void intel_free_coherent(struct device *hwdev,
>    size_t size,
>     }
>     #define  SG_ENT_VIRT_ADDRESS(sg)         (page_address((sg)->page)  +
>    (sg)->offset)
>    -static void intel_unmap_sg(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
>    +static  void  intel_unmap_sg(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist
>    *sglist,
>            int nelems, int dir)
>     {
>            int i;
>    @@ -1973,16 +1973,17 @@ static void intel_unmap_sg(struct device *hwdev,
>    struct scatterlist *sg,
>            struct iova *iova;
>            size_t size = 0;
>            void *addr;
>    +       struct scatterlist *sg;
>            if (pdev->sysdata == DUMMY_DEVICE_DOMAIN_INFO)
>                    return;
>            domain = find_domain(pdev);
>    -       iova = find_iova(&domain->iovad, IOVA_PFN(sg[0].dma_address));
>    +       iova = find_iova(&domain->iovad, IOVA_PFN(sglist[0].dma_address));
>            if (!iova)
>                    return;
>    -       for (i = 0; i < nelems; i++, sg++) {
>    +       for_each_sg(sglist, sg, nelems, i) {
>                    addr = SG_ENT_VIRT_ADDRESS(sg);
>                    size += aligned_size((u64)addr, sg->length);
>            }
>    @@ -2003,20 +2004,20 @@ static void intel_unmap_sg(struct device *hwdev,
>    struct scatterlist *sg,
>     }
>     static int intel_nontranslate_map_sg(struct device *hddev,
>    -       struct scatterlist *sg, int nelems, int dir)
>    +       struct scatterlist *sglist, int nelems, int dir)
>     {
>            int i;
>    +       struct scatterlist *sg;
>    -       for (i = 0; i < nelems; i++) {
>    -               struct scatterlist *s = &sg[i];
>    -               BUG_ON(!s->page);
>    -               s->dma_address = virt_to_bus(SG_ENT_VIRT_ADDRESS(s));
>    -               s->dma_length = s->length;
>    +       for_each_sg(sglist, sg, nelems, i) {
>    +               BUG_ON(!sg->page);
>    +               sg->dma_address = virt_to_bus(SG_ENT_VIRT_ADDRESS(sg));
>    +               sg->dma_length = sg->length;
>            }
>            return nelems;
>     }
>    -static int intel_map_sg(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
>    +static int intel_map_sg(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sglist,
>            int nelems, int dir)
>     {
>            void *addr;
>    @@ -2028,18 +2029,18 @@ static int intel_map_sg(struct device *hwdev, struct
>    scatterlist *sg,
>            size_t offset = 0;
>            struct iova *iova = NULL;
>            int ret;
>    -       struct scatterlist *orig_sg = sg;
>    +       struct scatterlist *sg;
>            unsigned long start_addr;
>            BUG_ON(dir == DMA_NONE);
>            if (pdev->sysdata == DUMMY_DEVICE_DOMAIN_INFO)
>    -               return intel_nontranslate_map_sg(hwdev, sg, nelems, dir);
>    +               return intel_nontranslate_map_sg(hwdev, sglist, nelems,
>    dir);
>            domain = get_valid_domain_for_dev(pdev);
>            if (!domain)
>                    return 0;
>    -       for (i = 0; i < nelems; i++, sg++) {
>    +       for_each_sg(sglist, sg, nelems, i) {
>                    addr = SG_ENT_VIRT_ADDRESS(sg);
>                    addr = (void *)virt_to_phys(addr);
>                    size += aligned_size((u64)addr, sg->length);
>    @@ -2047,7 +2048,7 @@ static int intel_map_sg(struct device *hwdev, struct
>    scatterlist *sg,
>            iova = __intel_alloc_iova(hwdev, domain, size);
>            if (!iova) {
>    -               orig_sg->dma_length = 0;
>    +               sglist->dma_length = 0;
>                    return 0;
>            }
>    @@ -2063,8 +2064,7 @@ static int intel_map_sg(struct device *hwdev, struct
>    scatterlist *sg,
>            start_addr = iova->pfn_lo << PAGE_SHIFT_4K;
>            offset = 0;
>    -       sg = orig_sg;
>    -       for (i = 0; i < nelems; i++, sg++) {
>    +       for_each_sg(sglist, sg, nelems, i) {
>                    addr = SG_ENT_VIRT_ADDRESS(sg);
>                    addr = (void *)virt_to_phys(addr);
>                    size = aligned_size((u64)addr, sg->length);
>    --
>    1.5.2.4

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH -mm] intel-iommu sg chaining support
  2007-10-01 16:12 ` Keshavamurthy, Anil S
@ 2007-10-03 21:12   ` Andrew Morton
  2007-10-03 21:14     ` Keshavamurthy, Anil S
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2007-10-03 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Keshavamurthy, Anil S; +Cc: tomof, linux-kernel, jens.axboe, fujita.tomonori

On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 09:12:56 -0700
"Keshavamurthy, Anil S" <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 05:16:38AM -0700, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > 
> >    x86_64 defines ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN. So if IOMMU implementations don't
> >    support sg chaining, we will get data corruption.
> >    Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> 
> Acked-by: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>
> 

Am I correct in believing that this patch is needed only when the
chaining patches which are presently in git-block are combined with the
intel-iommu work which is presently in -mm?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH -mm] intel-iommu sg chaining support
  2007-10-03 21:12   ` Andrew Morton
@ 2007-10-03 21:14     ` Keshavamurthy, Anil S
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Keshavamurthy, Anil S @ 2007-10-03 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton
  Cc: Keshavamurthy, Anil S, tomof, linux-kernel, jens.axboe,
	fujita.tomonori

On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 02:12:03PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 09:12:56 -0700
> "Keshavamurthy, Anil S" <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 05:16:38AM -0700, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > > 
> > >    x86_64 defines ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN. So if IOMMU implementations don't
> > >    support sg chaining, we will get data corruption.
> > >    Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>
> > 
> 
> Am I correct in believing that this patch is needed only when the
> chaining patches which are presently in git-block are combined with the
> intel-iommu work which is presently in -mm?
Yes, that is correct. 

-Anil

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-03 21:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-09-29 12:16 [PATCH -mm] intel-iommu sg chaining support FUJITA Tomonori
2007-10-01 16:12 ` Keshavamurthy, Anil S
2007-10-03 21:12   ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-03 21:14     ` Keshavamurthy, Anil S

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox