From: "Denys" <nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 2.6.21 -> 2.6.22 & 2.6.23-rc8 performance regression
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 17:48:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070930144443.M52139@visp.net.lb> (raw)
I've moved recently one of my proxies(squid and some compressing application)
from 2.6.21 to 2.6.22, and notice huge performance drop. I think this is
important, cause it can cause serious regression on some other workloads like
busy web-servers and etc.
After some analysis of different options i can bring more exact numbers:
2.6.21 able to process 500-550 requests/second and 15-20 Mbit/s of traffic,
and working great without any slowdown or instability.
2.6.22 able to process only 250-300 requests and 8-10 Mbit/s of traffic, ssh
and console is "freezing" (there is delay even for typing characters).
Both proxies is on identical hardware(Sun Fire X4100), configuration(small
system, LFS-like, on USB flash), different only kernel.
I tried to disable/enable various options and optimisations - it doesn't
change anything, till i reach SLUB/SLAB option.
I've loaded proxy configuration to gentoo PC with 2.6.22 (then upgraded it to
2.6.23-rc8), and having same effect.
Additionally, when load reaching maximum i can notice whole system slowdown,
for example ssh and scp takes much more time to run, even i do nice -n -5 for
them.
But even choosing 2.6.23-rc8+SLAB i noticed same "freezing" of ssh (and sure
it slowdown other kind of network performance), but much less comparing with
SLUB. On top i am seeing ksoftirqd taking almost 100% (sometimes ksoftirqd/0,
sometimes ksoftirqd/1).
I tried also different tricks with scheduler (/proc/sys/kernel/sched*), but
it's also didn't help.
When it freezes it looks like:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
7 root 15 -5 0 0 0 R 64 0.0 2:47.48 ksoftirqd/1
5819 root 20 0 134m 130m 596 R 57 3.3 4:36.78 globax
5911 squid 20 0 1138m 1.1g 2124 R 26 28.9 2:24.87 squid
10 root 15 -5 0 0 0 S 1 0.0 0:01.86 events/1
6130 root 20 0 3960 2416 1592 S 0 0.1 0:08.02 oprofiled
Oprofile results:
Thats oprofile with 2.6.23-rc8 - SLUB
73918 21.5521 check_bytes
38361 11.1848 acpi_pm_read
14077 4.1044 init_object
13632 3.9747 ip_send_reply
8486 2.4742 __slab_alloc
7199 2.0990 nf_iterate
6718 1.9588 page_address
6716 1.9582 tcp_v4_rcv
6425 1.8733 __slab_free
5604 1.6339 on_freelist
Thats oprofile with 2.6.23-rc8 - SLAB
CPU: AMD64 processors, speed 2592.64 MHz (estimated)
Counted CPU_CLK_UNHALTED events (Cycles outside of halt state) with a unit
mask of 0x00 (No unit mask) count 100000
samples % symbol name
138991 14.0627 acpi_pm_read
52401 5.3018 tcp_v4_rcv
48466 4.9037 nf_iterate
38043 3.8491 __slab_alloc
34155 3.4557 ip_send_reply
20963 2.1210 ip_rcv
19475 1.9704 csum_partial
19084 1.9309 kfree
17434 1.7639 ip_output
17278 1.7481 netif_receive_skb
15248 1.5428 nf_hook_slow
My .config is at http://www.nuclearcat.com/.config (there is SPARSEMEM
enabled, it doesn't make any noticeable difference)
Please CC me on reply, i am not in list.
--
Denys Fedoryshchenko
Technical Manager
Virtual ISP S.A.L.
next reply other threads:[~2007-09-30 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-30 14:48 Denys [this message]
2007-09-30 17:48 ` 2.6.21 -> 2.6.22 & 2.6.23-rc8 performance regression Eric Dumazet
2007-09-30 4:25 ` Nick Piggin
2007-09-30 22:04 ` Denys
2007-10-01 10:01 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-01 10:30 ` Denys
2007-10-01 11:14 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-01 11:52 ` Denys
2007-10-01 11:57 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-01 12:04 ` Denys
2007-09-30 22:35 ` Denys
2007-10-01 5:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-10-01 7:12 ` David Miller
2007-10-01 8:07 ` Denys
2007-10-01 8:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-10-01 8:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-10-01 12:10 ` Denys
2007-10-01 13:26 ` Denys
2007-10-01 20:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-10-01 20:57 ` David Miller
2007-09-30 23:24 ` Denys
2007-10-01 6:43 ` Denys
2007-09-30 18:45 ` Denys
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-30 15:22 Denys
2007-09-30 17:31 Denys
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070930144443.M52139@visp.net.lb \
--to=nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox