From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753973AbXJBOSX (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2007 10:18:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751948AbXJBOSQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2007 10:18:16 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:35029 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751628AbXJBOSP (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2007 10:18:15 -0400 From: Andi Kleen Organization: SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Nuernberg, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) To: Kirill Korotaev Subject: Re: [PATCH] mark read_crX() asm code as volatile Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 16:17:44 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , devel@openvz.org References: <470250E0.5090706@openvz.org> In-Reply-To: <470250E0.5090706@openvz.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200710021617.44901.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 02 October 2007 16:08:32 Kirill Korotaev wrote: > Some gcc versions (I checked at least 4.1.1 from RHEL5 & 4.1.2 from gentoo) > can generate incorrect code with read_crX()/write_crX() functions mix up, > due to cached results of read_crX(). added thanks -Andi