From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
menage@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dino@in.ibm.com,
cpw@sgi.com
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: fix sched-domains partitioning by cpusets
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 02:39:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071003023924.c4c5b2ef.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071003093517.GA22558@elte.hu>
> in any case i'd like to see the externally visible API get in foremost -
> and there now seems to be agreement about that. (yay!) Any internal
> shaping of APIs can be done flexibly between cpusets and the scheduler.
Yup - though Nick and I will have to agree to -some- internal interface
between the cpuset and sched code, at least for the moment.
At least, if we thrash about on this, we won't be changing the externally
visible API around. We'll just continue driving Andrew nuts, not our
users - that's an improvement.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-03 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-30 10:44 [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag Paul Jackson
2007-09-29 19:21 ` Nick Piggin
2007-09-30 18:07 ` Paul Jackson
2007-09-30 3:34 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-01 3:42 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-02 13:05 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-03 6:58 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-02 16:09 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-03 9:55 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-02 17:56 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-03 11:38 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-02 19:25 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-03 12:14 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-02 19:53 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-03 12:41 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-02 20:30 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-03 17:46 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-03 12:17 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-02 20:31 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-03 17:44 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-01 18:15 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-02 13:35 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-03 6:22 ` [patch] sched: fix sched-domains partitioning by cpusets Ingo Molnar
2007-10-03 6:56 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-02 15:46 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-03 9:21 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-02 17:23 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-03 10:08 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-03 9:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-03 9:39 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2007-10-02 17:29 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-03 7:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-03 7:25 ` [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag Paul Jackson
2007-10-02 16:14 ` Nick Piggin
2007-09-30 10:44 ` [PATCH] cpuset decrustify update and validate masks Paul Jackson
2007-09-30 17:33 ` [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag Ingo Molnar
2007-10-02 20:22 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-10-02 20:57 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071003023924.c4c5b2ef.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cpw@sgi.com \
--cc=dino@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox