From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, randy.dunlap@oracle.com,
menage@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dino@in.ibm.com,
cpw@sgi.com, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag fixes
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:39:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071005163918.46d40fed.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071005161305.af27f452.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew wrote:
> I'm getting 100% rejects from this - probably whatever patch it is
> patching got lost or unrecognisably mangled.
Yup - so far as I can tell, you didn't pick up the base patch that
this current patch fixes. So, no, I wouldn't expect this patch to
make any sense.
As I stated in this current patch in the diffstat section after the
'---' marker, this current patch applies to the base patch of Subject:
[PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag
You probably didn't pick up that base patch because Nick and I are
still haggling over it. Well ... we've agreed, but I can't get the
scheduler to work as I thought Nick wanted, and I'm still waiting
to hear from Nick again.
==> So yeah - throw this current patch out.
Nick ... you there ?
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-05 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-03 11:44 [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag fixes Paul Jackson
2007-10-05 23:13 ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-05 23:39 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2007-10-06 5:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-06 6:01 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-06 6:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-06 6:28 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071005163918.46d40fed.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cpw@sgi.com \
--cc=dino@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox