* [Q] APM depends on PM_SLEEP?
@ 2007-10-05 14:18 Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-10-05 15:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski @ 2007-10-05 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: linux-pm
Why does APM depend on PM_SLEEP? So without sleep support you cannot use
"Make CPU Idle calls when idle ", "Use real mode APM BIOS call to power
off" etc? Found in 23-rc9-git of yesterday.
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Q] APM depends on PM_SLEEP?
2007-10-05 14:18 [Q] APM depends on PM_SLEEP? Guennadi Liakhovetski
@ 2007-10-05 15:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-10-05 16:27 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2007-10-05 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-pm
On Friday, 5 October 2007 16:18, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Why does APM depend on PM_SLEEP?
Because APM uses the suspend core functions in drivers/base/power .
> So without sleep support you cannot use "Make CPU Idle calls when idle ",
> "Use real mode APM BIOS call to power off" etc? Found in 23-rc9-git of
> yesterday.
Selecting CONFIG_SUSPEND without ACPI only causes the suspend core (used
by APM) and kernel/power/main.c to be compiled in.
Greetings,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Q] APM depends on PM_SLEEP?
2007-10-05 15:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2007-10-05 16:27 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-10-05 21:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski @ 2007-10-05 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-pm
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, 5 October 2007 16:18, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Why does APM depend on PM_SLEEP?
>
> Because APM uses the suspend core functions in drivers/base/power .
Ok, perhaps, a "select" would be better?...
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Q] APM depends on PM_SLEEP?
2007-10-05 16:27 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
@ 2007-10-05 21:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2007-10-05 21:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-pm
On Friday, 5 October 2007 18:27, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > On Friday, 5 October 2007 16:18, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > Why does APM depend on PM_SLEEP?
> >
> > Because APM uses the suspend core functions in drivers/base/power .
>
> Ok, perhaps, a "select" would be better?...
Select doesn't work really well.
It probably would be better to add something like APM_SUSPEND
depending on SUSPEND.
Greetings,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-05 21:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-10-05 14:18 [Q] APM depends on PM_SLEEP? Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-10-05 15:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-10-05 16:27 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-10-05 21:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox