From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763485AbXJFG3G (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Oct 2007 02:29:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751940AbXJFG2z (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Oct 2007 02:28:55 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:36596 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751656AbXJFG2y (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Oct 2007 02:28:54 -0400 Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 23:28:49 -0700 From: Paul Jackson To: Ingo Molnar Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, randy.dunlap@oracle.com, menage@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dino@in.ibm.com, cpw@sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag fixes Message-Id: <20071005232849.5eede577.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20071006062156.GA28237@elte.hu> References: <20071003114401.32194.73464.sendpatchset@jackhammer.engr.sgi.com> <20071005161305.af27f452.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071005163918.46d40fed.pj@sgi.com> <20071006055324.GC23397@elte.hu> <20071005230141.63a1f6c3.pj@sgi.com> <20071006062156.GA28237@elte.hu> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.3; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > i'd suggest we go with what we have now Ok - I'll try sending this against 2.6.23-rc8-mm2 in a couple of hours, if it goes well. > We cannot merge it via sched.git because it has some containers > (or other?) dependencies, right? This sched_load_balance flag patch collides with the cgroup (aka container) patches if I'm not careful, yes. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401