From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756120AbXJHAMk (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Oct 2007 20:12:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751499AbXJHAMd (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Oct 2007 20:12:33 -0400 Received: from smtp106.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.216]:44727 "HELO smtp106.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750910AbXJHAMc (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Oct 2007 20:12:32 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=wIxxqYg/wTBz4i//fTRZg8NosGz+CBZ2Yo3LgfADIpYIN5XQ12mqcMTWe/3u4ARgT/gAveX6P3r26SZepP7BOJJTcWCH90Bhe0ZKUiP5DJdrWD4ShQ3vcO/8uGA2tcYxiIdd4SW0HOPZagWP9E3Zh6tJOlEbfBQC9J1haQBwNMc= ; X-YMail-OSG: jptVOjgVM1mAxHWZd8sz2gZJEAFUmngfOAMhIpBxzjo3foCQnp4RNTtPKukkEgHN81YSgMtxuA-- From: Nick Piggin To: Paul Jackson Subject: Re: [DEBUG PATCH] demonstration of hang in sched domain partitioning code Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 17:40:46 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Andrew Morton , Cliff Wickman , Paul Menage , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap , Dinakar Guniguntala , Ingo Molnar References: <20071005092432.32047.60952.sendpatchset@jackhammer.engr.sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20071005092432.32047.60952.sendpatchset@jackhammer.engr.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200710071740.47377.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 05 October 2007 19:24, Paul Jackson wrote: > Nick, > > I'm running into a problem trying to use your suggested > partition_sched_domains(cpumask_t *partition) routine the way > I thought I was supposed to be able to use it. > > If I ask to set up the same partition twice in a row having > just one CPU in it (a singleton) the kernel hangs. > > I don't know enough about kernel/sched.c to be able to debug > this very efficiently. Any chance you could take a look? Hi Paul, Yeah I'll take a look. Meanwhile, as Ingo said, the recent patch you sent is reasonable enough because the most critical thing to do is to allow users to move away from the old interface.