From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Markus Rechberger <mrechberger@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
mchehab@infradead.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
linux-dvb-maintainer@linuxtv.org, video4linux-list@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] [GIT PATCHES] V4L/DVB changes for 2.6.24
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 03:11:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071011071100.GA28382@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d9def9db0710102209g1cc905a7w5565f1ecda720ea4@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 07:09:47AM +0200, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> It makes no sense to keep the kernel driver uptodate, it would make
> more sense to support the latest driver (which some people are
> supporting).
> I just had a look at the driver downloads it makes around 600
> downloads for september for this driver.
600 downloads a month may seem like a lot to you for one driver.
But think about how many people are running distribution kernels
rather than kernels they built themselves. Typically none of
these people will even know your driver exists, let alone go
running after it to download/build it.
>From an end-user perspective, out of tree drivers are a nuisance.
Time and time again, I get bug reports from users claiming
some bug is in the kernel, where the problem is actually that
they're running some out of tree driver that hasn't been
updated to run on the latest kernels.
It's really in everyones (including yours) best interests
to get drivers merged into mainline.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-11 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-10 21:50 [GIT PATCHES] V4L/DVB changes for 2.6.24 Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2007-10-10 23:00 ` [v4l-dvb-maintainer] " Markus Rechberger
2007-10-10 23:24 ` Markus Rechberger
2007-10-10 23:35 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-10-11 4:59 ` Markus Rechberger
2007-10-11 9:50 ` Aidan Thornton
2007-10-11 10:42 ` Pádraig Brady
2007-10-11 11:39 ` Markus Rechberger
2007-10-10 23:36 ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-11 5:09 ` Markus Rechberger
2007-10-11 5:32 ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-11 5:50 ` Markus Rechberger
2007-10-11 7:11 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2007-10-14 10:40 ` Markus Rechberger
2007-10-14 11:12 ` Hans Verkuil
2007-10-14 11:28 ` Markus Rechberger
2007-10-14 20:49 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2007-10-10 23:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-11 4:50 ` Markus Rechberger
2007-10-11 6:08 ` Aurelien Jarno
2007-10-11 6:31 ` Markus Rechberger
2007-10-11 9:33 ` Marcel Siegert
2007-10-11 10:20 ` Markus Rechberger
2007-10-11 12:54 ` Marcel Siegert
2007-10-11 13:01 ` Markus Rechberger
2007-10-11 13:22 ` Aurelien Jarno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071011071100.GA28382@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-dvb-maintainer@linuxtv.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
--cc=mrechberger@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=video4linux-list@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox