From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755451AbXJLC0n (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:26:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753356AbXJLC0g (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:26:36 -0400 Received: from ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.57]:39767 "EHLO ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751641AbXJLC0f (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:26:35 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:26:33 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] __do_softirq() loop cleanup Message-ID: <20071012022633.GA10949@goodmis.org> References: <20071010121619.GA32677@saeurebad.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071010121619.GA32677@saeurebad.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 02:16:19PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote: > Hi, > > This changes __do_softirq() to use a C looping construct instead of > simulating one by means of goto. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner > I've read over the logic three times and it seems to keep with the original design. So unless I missed something ... Acked-by: Steven Rostedt -- Steve