From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Alistair John Strachan <alistair@devzero.co.uk>
Cc: Stefan Heinrichsen <gelbemauer@gmx.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Which companies are helping developing the kernel
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:59:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071015025908.GA6223@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710142328.46850.alistair@devzero.co.uk>
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 11:28:46PM +0100, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> On Sunday 14 October 2007 23:06:22 Stefan Heinrichsen wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I posted this question at comp.linux.misc and where told this would be a
> > better place therefore. I would like to do a internship in the field of the
> > Linux kernel.
> > Can someone tell me where to find a list of companies (don't matter in
> > which country) that employ kernel developers?
>
> I think Greg wrote a paper on this subject, so I've added him to CC in case he
> has the link handy.
Yeah, but my paper didn't really track companies very well. The lwn.net
article is the best, and below is my version of who did things in
2.6.23. Note, the lack of a company is not an indicator that they did
nothing, just that I could not easily determine someone worked for them.
I'll try to send out my "who are you working for" emails in a week or so
to see if I can further categorize the "unknowns".
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------------------
Processed 7075 csets from 992 developers
126 employers found
Top changeset contributors by employer
(Unknown) 1116 (15.8%)
(None) 843 (11.9%)
Red Hat 827 (11.7%)
IBM 557 (7.9%)
Linux Foundation 528 (7.5%)
Novell 449 (6.3%)
Intel 242 (3.4%)
Oracle 158 (2.2%)
MIPS Technologies 143 (2.0%)
Nokia 133 (1.9%)
NetApp 119 (1.7%)
NTT 99 (1.4%)
Astaro 97 (1.4%)
MontaVista 90 (1.3%)
(Consultant) 86 (1.2%)
SGI 84 (1.2%)
Qumranet 74 (1.0%)
QLogic 70 (1.0%)
(Academia) 70 (1.0%)
SWsoft 64 (0.9%)
Analog Devices 61 (0.9%)
HP 60 (0.8%)
Sony 59 (0.8%)
rPath 56 (0.8%)
XenSource 53 (0.7%)
CERN 49 (0.7%)
CC Computer Consultants 48 (0.7%)
Freescale 47 (0.7%)
Fujitsu 47 (0.7%)
Tripeaks 46 (0.7%)
linutronix 44 (0.6%)
Snapgear 39 (0.6%)
Simtec 34 (0.5%)
Atmel 28 (0.4%)
Google 28 (0.4%)
Cisco 27 (0.4%)
Toshiba 25 (0.4%)
Broadcom 25 (0.4%)
SteelEye 24 (0.3%)
Renesas Technology 23 (0.3%)
Mellanox 21 (0.3%)
LSI Logic 17 (0.2%)
Adaptec 16 (0.2%)
Wipro 15 (0.2%)
Marvell 14 (0.2%)
Miracle Linux 14 (0.2%)
Solid Boot Ltd. 14 (0.2%)
AMD 12 (0.2%)
Hitachi 11 (0.2%)
ARM 11 (0.2%)
Canonical 10 (0.1%)
XIV Information Systems 9 (0.1%)
OpenedHand 9 (0.1%)
Open Grid Computing 9 (0.1%)
Veritas 8 (0.1%)
Secretlab 7 (0.1%)
Neterion 7 (0.1%)
Katalix Systems 7 (0.1%)
SANPeople 7 (0.1%)
Digi International 7 (0.1%)
Znyx Networks 6 (0.1%)
Wind River 6 (0.1%)
NEC 6 (0.1%)
Wolfson Microelectronics 6 (0.1%)
SUNY Computer Science 6 (0.1%)
NetXen 6 (0.1%)
NVidia 6 (0.1%)
Myricom 6 (0.1%)
Chelsio 5 (0.1%)
Realtek 5 (0.1%)
IPUnity-Glenayre 5 (0.1%)
Linux Networx 5 (0.1%)
Barco 4 (0.1%)
SIOS Technology 4 (0.1%)
MIPS 4 (0.1%)
University of Aberdeen 4 (0.1%)
PiKRON s.r.o 4 (0.1%)
Pardus 4 (0.1%)
Crash Barrier 4 (0.1%)
Tresys 4 (0.1%)
ClusterFS 4 (0.1%)
Macq Electronique 3 (0.0%)
OLPC 3 (0.0%)
CompuLab 3 (0.0%)
DENX Software Engineering 3 (0.0%)
Embedded Alley Solutions 3 (0.0%)
Twin Sun 3 (0.0%)
Transmode Systems 3 (0.0%)
Cosmosbay~Vectis 3 (0.0%)
Pengutronix 2 (0.0%)
Sierra Wireless 2 (0.0%)
Real-Time Remedies 2 (0.0%)
Bull 2 (0.0%)
ScaleMP Inc. 2 (0.0%)
Samsung 2 (0.0%)
MicroGate Systems 2 (0.0%)
Atomide 2 (0.0%)
US National Security Agency 2 (0.0%)
VMWare 2 (0.0%)
Verismo 2 (0.0%)
Akamai Technologies 2 (0.0%)
CE Linux Forum 2 (0.0%)
Siemens 1 (0.0%)
ONELAN 1 (0.0%)
Xorcom 1 (0.0%)
EXOSEC 1 (0.0%)
LWN.net 1 (0.0%)
Texas Instruments 1 (0.0%)
Promise Technology 1 (0.0%)
VA Linux Systems Japan 1 (0.0%)
University of Sevilla 1 (0.0%)
Motorola 1 (0.0%)
HES-SO Valais Wallis 1 (0.0%)
SYSGO 1 (0.0%)
Via 1 (0.0%)
Telecom-Service 1 (0.0%)
Hauppauge 1 (0.0%)
DSA 1 (0.0%)
Vivecode 1 (0.0%)
Mandriva 1 (0.0%)
ATRON electronic 1 (0.0%)
Cytronics & Melware 1 (0.0%)
M&N Solutions 1 (0.0%)
Rockwell 1 (0.0%)
8D Technologies 1 (0.0%)
University of Cambridge 1 (0.0%)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-15 2:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-14 22:06 Which companies are helping developing the kernel Stefan Heinrichsen
2007-10-14 22:28 ` Alistair John Strachan
2007-10-14 22:35 ` Benoit Boissinot
2007-10-15 2:59 ` Greg KH [this message]
2007-10-14 22:54 ` Guilherme Amadio
2007-10-14 22:55 ` Jiri Kosina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071015025908.GA6223@suse.de \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=alistair@devzero.co.uk \
--cc=gelbemauer@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox