From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764856AbXJONhr (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:37:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758917AbXJONhh (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:37:37 -0400 Received: from hu-out-0506.google.com ([72.14.214.237]:24688 "EHLO hu-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757787AbXJONhg (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:37:36 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=LM10WhnSxhZBeTv2j+LCncTyi6R6+lUDRejI7ie6U2ltWuc9zLxkXBq1C6dUU/xvtNehgGZecl1ndmXceS1eWJWH6L7J/FNWJV+LzFA56+kH+y/wkBL3wFfO1N9r5NTacCQbOzXSlXlnz2P0iF3cAjTaayaR0xjCe1nGYf+38Mg= Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:33:56 +0800 From: WANG Cong To: Adrian Bunk Cc: WANG Cong , mb@bu3sch.de, st3@riseup.net, Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Jonathan Corbet Subject: Re: [-mm Patch] drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c: fix an uninitialized variable Message-ID: <20071015133356.GQ2444@hacking> Reply-To: WANG Cong References: <20071014175142.GN4211@stusta.de> <20071015113445.GO2444@hacking> <20071015125644.GB5417@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071015125644.GB5417@stusta.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 02:56:44PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: >On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 07:34:45PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: >> >> Fix an uninitialized variable in drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c::b43_start(). >> >> From: Adrian Bunk Reported-by: Adrian Bunk > >A technical remark regarding these two patches: > >These are your patches, not mine. > >You can note formally or informally that I reported/forwarded these >issues, but I'm neither in a legal sense the author of these patches nor >am I in a technical sense responsible for their correctness [1], and a >From: tag is therefore not appropriate. > OK. I look through Jonathan's patch[1], but didn't find a proper tag as you suggested. I think the "Reported-by:" tag may be appropriate, as the above. So, we need a "Reported-by:" tag, Jonathan. Could you please consider to add it into your patch? I didn't see it in -mm1 tree or I can give you a patch. CC: Jonathan Corbet Thanks! [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/11/255 -- May the Source Be With You.