From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
shemminger@linux-foundation.org, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:2161 net_rx_action()
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:07:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071015220720.GA16101@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071015220357.GA7174@elte.hu>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > This is a driver bug, the work "budget" passed into a driver's
> > ->poll() handler should never be exceeded. That's what this warning
> > assertion is checking.
> >
> > What ethernet card is in your system and what driver is being used
> > to drive it?
>
> it's forcedeth.
>
> i've checked nv_napi_poll(), and i dont see how it could return larger
> than 'limit' number of packets.
>
> it could return packets == limit though:
>
> pkts = nv_rx_process_optimized(dev, budget);
> ...
>
> if (pkts < budget) {
> /* re-enable receive interrupts */
> spin_lock_irqsave(&np->lock, flags);
>
> __netif_rx_complete(dev, napi);
>
> ...
> return pkts;
>
> shouldnt that be "pkts <= budget"? But even that shouldnt cause a larger
> than limit return. Weird.
>
> there are two networking cards in the system, the other one is a:
>
> eth1: RealTek RTL8139 at 0xf080e000, 00:c0:df:03:68:5d, IRQ 11
> eth1: Identified 8139 chip type 'RTL-8139B'
>
> but this one should be inactive (not plugged into the network). Should
> i try to get a debug print out of the actual 'weight' and 'work'
> integers, and of the n->poll function address?
ok, i've added such a patch.
looking at the dev.c code - can napi_struct->weight be zero
legitimately? If yes then the 0 gets passed to the driver and the driver
would return 1 - violating the assertion.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-15 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-15 11:24 WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:2161 net_rx_action() Ingo Molnar
2007-10-15 11:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-15 16:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-15 19:57 ` David Miller
2007-10-15 22:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-15 22:07 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-10-15 22:21 ` David Miller
2007-10-15 22:30 ` [patch] forcedeth: fix the NAPI poll function Ingo Molnar
2007-10-15 22:39 ` David Miller
2007-10-15 22:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-15 22:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-16 5:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-16 5:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-16 6:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-16 7:17 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-16 7:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-16 16:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-16 21:20 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-17 7:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-17 10:18 ` [patch] forcedeth: fix the NAPI poll function, take #2 Ingo Molnar
2007-10-18 0:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-15 22:18 ` WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:2161 net_rx_action() David Miller
2007-10-15 22:20 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071015220720.GA16101@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox