From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@sw.ru>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: Possible circular locking: ->mmap_sem vs jbd_handle
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 02:08:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071016020826.6a0263cd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1192525512.27435.90.camel@twins>
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:05:12 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 02:01 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:54:29 +0400 Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@sw.ru> wrote:
> >
> > > Got this during LTP's diotest1. Reproducable.
> > >
> > > =======================================================
> > > [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> > > 2.6.23-65a6ec0d72a07f16719e9b7a96e1c4bae044b591 #2
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > diotest1/13563 is trying to acquire lock:
> > > (&mm->mmap_sem){----}, at: [<c107a7b7>] dio_get_page+0x4b/0x16b
> > >
> > > but task is already holding lock:
> > > (jbd_handle){--..}, at: [<c1099b05>] journal_start+0xf3/0x120
> > >
> > > which lock already depends on the new lock.
> >
> > Someone taught lockdep about journal_start? That's gonna hurt.
>
> It was you who suggested doing so,...
yeah, but I didn't think anyone would go and do it!
> Are these valid reports, or is the annotation wrong?
It's valid. There will be others..
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-16 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-16 8:54 Possible circular locking: ->mmap_sem vs jbd_handle Alexey Dobriyan
2007-10-16 9:01 ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-16 9:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-16 9:08 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071016020826.6a0263cd.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=adobriyan@sw.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox