From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: ego@in.ibm.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
vatsa@in.ibm.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
oleg@tv-sign.ru, mingo@elte.hu, paulmck@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] Refcount Based Cpu-Hotplug Implementation
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:27:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071017042709.02525cbd.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071017035327.ff1ed622.pj@sgi.com>
With the following patch, the four cpu hotplug patches by
Gautham R Shenoy boot successfully on my sn2_defconfig ia64
SN2 Altix system.
This patch moves the cpu_hotplug_init() code outside of the
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU code.
I will confess to being confused however as to the best way
to handle this. Having "cpu_hotplug_init" be a piece of code
that has to execute whether or not CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU is
enabled doesn't seem right.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
---
include/linux/cpu.h | 3 +--
kernel/cpu.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- 2.6.23-mm1.orig/include/linux/cpu.h 2007-10-17 03:59:59.529623639 -0700
+++ 2.6.23-mm1/include/linux/cpu.h 2007-10-17 04:03:56.257223754 -0700
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ static inline void unregister_cpu_notifi
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
extern struct sysdev_class cpu_sysdev_class;
+extern void cpu_hotplug_init(void);
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
/* Stop CPUs going up and down. */
@@ -97,7 +98,6 @@ static inline void cpuhotplug_mutex_unlo
mutex_unlock(cpu_hp_mutex);
}
-extern void cpu_hotplug_init(void);
extern void get_online_cpus(void);
extern void put_online_cpus(void);
#define hotcpu_notifier(fn, pri) { \
@@ -117,7 +117,6 @@ static inline void cpuhotplug_mutex_lock
static inline void cpuhotplug_mutex_unlock(struct mutex *cpu_hp_mutex)
{ }
-#define cpu_hotplug_init() do { } while (0)
#define get_online_cpus() do { } while (0)
#define put_online_cpus() do { } while (0)
#define hotcpu_notifier(fn, pri) do { (void)(fn); } while (0)
--- 2.6.23-mm1.orig/kernel/cpu.c 2007-10-17 03:59:59.873628872 -0700
+++ 2.6.23-mm1/kernel/cpu.c 2007-10-17 04:04:52.522079165 -0700
@@ -38,8 +38,6 @@ static struct {
#define writer_exists() (cpu_hotplug.active_writer != NULL)
-#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
-
void __init cpu_hotplug_init(void)
{
cpu_hotplug.active_writer = NULL;
@@ -48,6 +46,8 @@ void __init cpu_hotplug_init(void)
init_completion(&cpu_hotplug.readers_done);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
+
void get_online_cpus(void)
{
might_sleep();
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-17 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-16 10:33 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Refcount Based Cpu-Hotplug Revisit Gautham R Shenoy
2007-10-16 10:34 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] Refcount Based Cpu-Hotplug Implementation Gautham R Shenoy
2007-10-17 0:47 ` Rusty Russell
2007-10-17 5:37 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-10-17 6:29 ` Rusty Russell
2007-10-18 6:29 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-10-21 12:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-10-17 10:53 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-17 11:27 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2007-10-17 11:50 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-10-17 12:04 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-16 10:35 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] Rename lock_cpu_hotplug to get_online_cpus Gautham R Shenoy
2007-10-17 16:13 ` Nathan Lynch
2007-10-18 7:57 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-10-18 8:22 ` Nathan Lynch
2007-10-18 8:59 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-10-18 17:30 ` Nathan Lynch
2007-10-19 5:04 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-10-22 0:43 ` Nathan Lynch
2007-10-22 4:51 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-10-16 10:36 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] Replace per-subsystem mutexes with get_online_cpus Gautham R Shenoy
2007-10-21 11:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-10-22 4:58 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-10-16 10:37 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] Remove CPU_DEAD/CPU_UP_CANCELLED handling from workqueue.c Gautham R Shenoy
2007-10-17 11:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-10-16 17:20 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] Refcount Based Cpu-Hotplug Revisit Linus Torvalds
2007-10-17 2:11 ` Dipankar Sarma
2007-10-17 2:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-17 4:17 ` Gautham R Shenoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071017042709.02525cbd.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox