From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760426AbXJQE2Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:28:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751387AbXJQE2A (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:28:00 -0400 Received: from hu-out-0506.google.com ([72.14.214.239]:23848 "EHLO hu-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750985AbXJQE16 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:27:58 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=nRoXQYSB9U/P6MP26RlCo69MNorhlFYmQ9+njD4c5fB/R8zzl4xXqTaD4cqfX3oWb4/VVRmV54gclW+uTRVKVaV76mDY2CuClwKu63z4CP8nV0yg/YZbrjlMKP+s0YezB2RyqckiXNZiiUrOb5iDmazBBBCZ5vI6dgXG4iGM7cU= From: Maxim Levitsky To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: Fix to "All wake-up devices are disabled after suspend-to disk" isn't yet included in mainline Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 06:27:26 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org References: <200710170439.30359.maximlevitsky@gmail.com> <20071016204802.9036ad96.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20071016204802.9036ad96.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200710170627.26136.maximlevitsky@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 17 October 2007 05:48:02 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:39:30 +0200 Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > > A while ago I asked on LKML about the problem of loosing all wake device capabilities, after a suspend to disk > > (eg: I can't wake the system from keyboard if I suspend to disk and then to ram) > > > > I was provided with the patch that fixes this problem completely. > > The merge window is open, but I still don't see it in the kernel. > > Due to changes it doesn't anymore apply to latest git. > > > > Was it missed? > > No, it's in Len's git tree. > > Len's git-pull request from a few days ago didn't work, perhaps because I > wanted to know if a recent -mm regression had been fixed and that hasn't > been answered yet. I assume that Len is offline. Other acpi developers > could presumably have answered that question but for some reason chose not to. > > I'm presently holding off 20-odd power management patches due to their > dependency upon an acpi merge... > Thanks a lot. Best regards, Maxim Levitsky